Adil Najam
Just how inhuman can the murderous zeal of fanatics be?
Here are the essential facts: Two suicide killers, hiding behind burqas, murdered more than 40 people, and injured another 60+, in two explosions minutes apart, at an IDP (internally displaced peoples) refugee camp at Katcha Pakka near Kohat, as they gathered to register for relief goods and as food was being distributed to them.
Yes, you read it right.
They murdered people who have already been made homeless. They killed people gathered to collect food and relief goods. They killed deliberately. They murdered on purpose. This was not an accident or bad planning. They had planned to kill. They had wanted to murder. They planned to kill women and children and innocent civilians.
That is exactly what they wanted to do. That is exactly what they did.
This is neither unique as an incident nor unique in its brutality and inhumanity.
Yesterday, it was a hospital – yes, hospital – that was attacked in Quetta where Muslims were mourning the death of a murdered Shia leader.
The butchers were butchering. Deliberately. Purposefully. Inhumanly.
The blood boils, eyes swell up and humanity cries whenever an innocent soul is killed. No matter why. No matter by whom. No matter how. But when the murder is so callous, so planned, so deliberate, so inhuman, the heart skips a beat, the mind is baffled, and something dies within each one of us. There is nothing more left to say.
What can one say that has not been said before. One seethes in ones anger. One sends out a silent prayer. One wipes off the tears. And one stares into the darkness. Trying desperately, trying senselessly, trying uselessly, to understand why anyone could do such a thing. How anyone could do such a thing.
One stares into the darkness. Knowing full well that no darkness known to man could be darker than the darkness that breeds this murder.
Adnan and other Taliban lovers have successfully diverted the discussion from the atrocities of the Taliban against refugees, to whether Jinnah was a kafir or not. The old tricks of the mullah.
hmm.. ok.. i’ll rephrase the question..
why can’t a “muslim” answer a question that questions Islam’s dictatorial authority over people ??
why is it that only name calling at the least.. or killing as a last resort is the fate for someone questioning Islam’s dictatorial authority ?
I’ve always wished God send a Prophet with a religion that doesn’t REQUIRE dictatorial authority.. but it never happened..
And I am not disagreeing that Islam calls for dictatorial authority.. the Taliban are doing the right thing according to scripture.. But the rest of us have a birth right to fight against dictatorial authority .. “just because” we are born free..
Yes Salman (Rushdie?), it is very important for us Muslims to go around killing all non-Muslims that we can find at all costs.
Obviously our religion has its share of nut cases. But please don’t ask such ridiculous questions and expect a serious response.
or in other words..
does anybody have the moral right to make a state “islamic” when there are people choosing to not follow islam, and still expecting to stay alive living in it ??
instead of talking about how great or not so great Islamic personalities were..
the topic was why MURDERING is so important in Islam in order for Islam to survive.. why can’t people choose to not follow islam and still stay alive in an “islamic” state ??