Dr. Abdus Salam: Beyond Physics

Posted on November 22, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, People, Religion, Science and Technology
503 Comments
Total Views: 298811

Adil Najam

Today marks Dr. Abdus Salam’s death anniversary. (See new biography of Dr. Salam here).

It should be a moment of deep reflection for all of us. He would have been as great a man as he was even if he did not won the Nobel Award in physics. But we would have conveniently forgotten him. That he did win the Nobel Award is a source of cosmetic and hollow pride for many Pakistanis. Cosmetic and hollow because it is also a source of visible unease. Even when we acknowledge that he was a great scientist (after all, the Nobel Committee thought so), we are uncomfortable acknowledging that he was a great man whose significance goes beyond his science.

As a brutally honest editorial in today’s Daily Times points out, “we are scared of honoring Dr. Salam.” We must not be.

The Daily Times editorial says all that needs to be said; it is worth reading, worth thinking about, and worth quoting in full:

The tragedy of our treatment of Dr Abdus Salam

Dr Abdus Salam (1926-1996) died ten years ago. He was the first Pakistani to get a Nobel Prize in 1979. But he might be the last if we continue to allow our state to evolve in a way that frightens the rest of the world. Our collective psyche runs more to accepted ‘wisdom’ than to scientific inquiry; and even if we were to display an uncharacteristic outcropping of individual genius the world may be so frightened of it that it might not give us our deserts.

We are scared of honouring Dr Salam because of our constitution which we have amended to declare his community as ‘non-Muslim’. When Dr Salam died in 1996 he had to be buried in Pakistan because he refused to give up his Pakistani nationality and acquire another that respected him more. But the Pakistani state was afraid of touching his dead body. He was therefore buried in Rabwa, the home town of his Ahmedi community whose name is also unacceptable to us and has been changed to Chenab Nagar by a state proclamation. But that was not the end of the story. After he was buried, the pious, law-abiding and constitution-loving people of Jhang, which is nearby, went over to Chenab Nagar to see if all had been done according to the constitutional provisions regarding the Ahmedi community to which he belonged.

And what did the constitution say? It said that the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or use any of the symbols of Islam. The original amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A Bhutto, a ‘liberal socialist-democrat’, and subsequent tightening of the law was done by the great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the civilians and the khakis had connived in the great betrayal of Dr Salam.

After the great scientist was buried in Chenab Nagar, his tombstone said “Abdus Salam the First Muslim Nobel Laureate”. Needless to say, the police arrived with a magistrate and rubbed off the ‘Muslim’ part of the katba. Now the tombstone says: Abdus Salam the First Nobel Laureate. The magistrate remained unfazed by what he had done but Dr Salam’s grave is actually the tombstone of a Muslim culture that Pakistan had inherited from the founder of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. But ironies fly thick in Pakistan. In Jhang, for example, where Dr Salam grew up as a precocious child, the schools that he endowed with scholarships and grants now teach communal hatred rather than the love that he had in mind when he gave them his money.

Meanwhile, the Ahmedi community is under daily pressure and anyone with a twisted mind is free to persecute them.

Abdus Salam was born in Jhang in 1926. At the age of 14, he got the highest marks ever recorded for the Matriculation Examination in Punjab. The whole town turned out to welcome him. He won a scholarship to Government College, Lahore, and took his MA in 1946. In the same year he was awarded a scholarship to St. John’s College, Cambridge, where he took a BA (honours) with a double First in mathematics and physics in 1949. In 1950 he received the Smith’s Prize from Cambridge University for the most outstanding pre-doctoral contribution to physics. He also obtained a PhD in theoretical physics at Cambridge; his thesis, published in 1951, contained fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics which had already gained him an international reputation.

In 1954 Dr Salam left his native country for a lectureship at Cambridge University. Before the Pakistani politicians apostatised him, he was a member of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, a member of the Scientific Commission of Pakistan and Chief Scientific Adviser to the President from 1961 to 1974. Pakistan’s space research agency Suparco was created by him and it is only symbolic that a group of Shia workers of Suparco were put to death in Karachi in 2004 by sectarian terrorists. Like Dr Salam, a lot of gifted Shia doctors have had to leave Pakistan because of the state’s twisted policies.

Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for General Zia who had “supplemented” the Second Amendment to the constitution with further comic disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to welcome the great scientist and had to be seen with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his government was already bristling, he took care to clip those sections of Dr Salam’s speech where he had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic expression. It was Dr Salam’s good luck that one of the believers did not go to court under Zia’s own laws to get the country’s only Nobel laureate sent to prison for six months of rigorous imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where he was received with great fanfare. He had gone there to simply meet his primary school mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and put it around the neck of his teacher.

Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago lest the government come under pressure to remove it from circulation. It is also true that his alma mater, Government College Lahore, now a university, has named certain ancillary departments and academic sessions after him following a long period of obscurantist domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty about what it has done to the greatest scientist it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the label of “rogue state” to Pakistan by selling the country’s nuclear technology for personal gain. Can we redeem ourselves by doing something in Dr Salam’s memory on this 10th anniversary of his passing that would please his soul and cleanse ours?

Repost: This post was originally published at ATP on November 22, 2006, on Dr. Salam’s 10th death anniversary.

503 responses to “Dr. Abdus Salam: Beyond Physics”

  1. saima nasir says:

    This is a link to the talk given by Pervez Hoodbhoy, professor of physics in Islamabad, at the Salam Memorial Meeting in Trieste, Italy. He made this speech in 1997 and it seems, it is still as relevant today as it was then.

    Dr. Hoodbhoy wrote his impressions of the great man in an article called “ENCOUNTERS WITH SALAM”, which can be read on this link;

    Abdus Salam: Past and Present
    by Pervez Hoodbhoy (published in THE NEWS, 29 January, 1996)

    can be read on this link;

    It is a pity, that we/our nation cannot rise above our religious and political differences to honour a hero like, Dr. Salam.
    In Dr. Hoodbhoy’s words,”Nothing hurt him more than the stony barrenness of the intellect in Islamic countries today. He was deeply mortified, he recalled, when a Nobel Prize winner in physics said to him: “Salam, do you really think we have an obligation to succour, aid, and keep alive those nations who have never created or added an iota to man’s stock of knowledge?”

    Is there anything left to say, after reading the above thought?…I think not…atleast for me.

  2. Farzana says:

    I am moved by reading this post and especially his speech to the Nobel group. What graceful words, what great pride in his Pakistani roots, and most of all not even a hint of sarcasm or bitterness. It is amazining how even third rate people in Pakistan proudly highlight only the American colleges they went to but here is someone at the top of the knowledge world taking pride in his Pakistani roots. And look how we treated him.

  3. @Shahbaz: Mashallah all of you are educated and have access to libraries and Internet, you guys could always read the sources rather making political statments right here. One can always read “Roohany Khazaen” and other books. It’s not a difficult task. Anyone who claimed to a prophet and start a new belief can’t be declared as Muslim. Long time back some qadyani was arguing with me and I had made a small note about false prophecies given by mirza ghulam to refute him as a messiah.

    I have no issue one follows islam or something else, as long as he/she is not being harmful for a society, he/she should be respected but claiming crap that Mullah declared a community ‘non-muslim’ is actually a sign of mental infertility. Qadyanis were declared non-muslims not only by Pakistan but other countries as well, that’s also true that many are returnig back to Islam and quitting that fragile belief. If I follow a religion then I should have enough courage to promote my religion in its true color rather disguise it as “Islam” or chiristianity etc.

    @sadia: I don’t consider shia as kafir, in my knowledge, they didn’t declare some new prophet in the name of Islam.

    @shahbaz: noone is ignoring their contribution but it’s not fair that if they’re contributing for a state then someone is free to do propaganda about certain community.

    And for those who advocate to give rights to non-muslims in pakistan should read this article. One can always confirm about it. If this is true then it’s really shame for me as a member of a muslim state.

  4. Saadia Khan says:

    Infact a very nice post, thanks Adil. But discussion of all muslim and non muslim stuff has made me to wonder that though I am sunni muslim, lets say far from shia, qadiyani, ismaili and many more….does it make me good muslim or good citizen??? I think we should leave the stuff called muslim and kafir and try to respect the humanity. We have enough sectarien fights and many innocent people die every year in these conflicts. Atleast the educated class of our country should think differently, then we can hope that one day everybody will live in peace.

  5. Ahsan says:

    I am glad that you have taken the initiative of reviving the memory of Dr. Abdus Salam. Dr. Salam is the greatest Scientific mind that the Indus Valley (peesent Pakistan) has ever produced. Such a brilliant son of the soil was indeed badly treated by his country. No matter, he was a Muslim or not, he was very religious person. He never hid his religion and never hesitated to talk of Islam in International Scientific Conferences. I remember, in the Summer of 1987, in Istambul (Turkey), during an Internation Physics Conference he started his Inaugral Speech with an Ayet from the Holy Book.

    Basically, it does not matter if he was either Muslim or not. He had his Faith, but he himself was beyond any Faith because he was a good “Human Being” or a “Perfect Man” which we also translate as “mard-e-kaamil”.

    I insist that for Dr. Salam the word “man” be written “mard” in Urdu and not merde as in “merde Haq” for Zia-ul-Haq. In Frnch merde means shit!

    Ahsan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*