Adil Najam
These pictures need no commentary. Click on pictures to link to related posts.
56 comments posted
Comment Pages: [7] 6 5 4 3 2 1 »
Comment Pages: [7] 6 5 4 3 2 1 »
Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)
Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.
Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.
If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!
Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.
Thanks, and keep the comments coming!
What goes up comes down. Zardari will also.
I was googling for something else but found this and its wworth checking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OcBUj-BeTM
well.. we all keep on saying what we have to say and laugh on them but in real they are going forward and doing what ever they would like to do with our and our generation’s future..
No matter who’s son will be graced by the crown but we need to open our eyes. GEO TV is one of the most cruel enemy of our nation….
Guys, let is not just comment on each other’s point of view.. but try to learn lesson and do something to prevent this in the future..
they are just playing with us for their own pleasure….
Why do Pakistanis believe that a leopard can change its spots? Are Pakistanis politically dumb?
After Zardari will come Crown Prince Bilwal’s turn, or it might be Hamza Sharif’s turn. This is the shamocracy that people are celebrating ??
Mush looks good in black sherwani. I give that picture more points than the rest.
raakh ho gya chaman armaanon ka
naam-o-nishan bhi na baccha mere fasanoon ka
i still sometimes cant believe that Mr.Pervaiz musharraf, the ever-so-composed, and the ever-so-determined would come to an end like that.
Harris
Ofcourse I am. ready and willing.
You are very right about things you have said, expecially about being fractured society and people living lives in little caccoons. And problems are deep, very deep indeed. But in every age and at every historical moment in any nations’ life, problems are deep and wide. These were so for Washington, jefferson and colleagues. These were so for Mao and comrades. They were so for Ghandi and Nehru. These were so for Jinnah.
Today I was thinking what must have the Prophet gone through? He must have felt so much despair, desperation and disappointment. Were there any moments of hopelessness for him? He had very few people with him and some of the most powerful people in Arabia were against him. He ran from pillar to post. Was stoned, chased, hit, abused, thrown out, forced to migrate and scorned upon for years. How strong his faith must have been. We must hold onto ours.
You are right about the party and you are spot on about everyone wanting to maintian status quo. except that there are exceptions and I have met people who do want a change and will do their bit for it.
So where do we start ? Lets start talking.
“It appears Mr Aqil Sajid has only referred to the article that argue’s his case. When the reality is entirely different. Load shedding has always been there.”
Not true. Load shedding was not always there; it had finished but resumed under Mush. The links I gave clearly show that the crisis was starting in 2006. By the winter of 2007 (when Mush was still around), it had already gotten pretty bad with 7-8 hour load shedding even in urban centers like Lahore. For example, you can check the following from Jan 2008:
http://pakistaniat.com/2008/01/03/more-crises-in-p akistan-electricity-flour-sugar-water-sui-gas-cris es-what-is-the-way-out/comment-page-9/
The links you provided refer to the present situation, and it is true that the non-payment of bills by this government has worsened the situation. I am no fan of the present government, but Mr. Usman is trying to present a story whereby all these problems suddenly started with the arrival of this new government and Mush was doing a great job. That is far from the truth. The apologists of Mush are blaming even his mistakes on the present government, and the supporters of the PPP are blaming all the misdeeds of the PPP on the establishment. Both appear to have more in common than they would care to admit.