Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat

Posted on March 19, 2009
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, People, Politics
671 Comments
Total Views: 122894

Adil Najam

As the politics of intrigue and rumor heats up, even more, in Pakistan and after the recent dramatic political events, the news of Pakistan’s most important existential battle – against the extremism of the Taliban and their ilk – seems to have slid off the front pages.

Yet, a news item in The News reminds us that the murderous militants are now setting their eyes towards District Dir, after gaining control of Swat. One got a better glimpse into the mind of one of the key players in the Swat saga, Sufi Mohammed, in an interview given to Daily Times’ Peshawar Bureau Chief Iqbal Khattak. Speaking in Mingora, the 74 year-old father-in-law of militant leader Fazlulah gives many important glimpses into his own thinking and priorities.

Here is the interview published in Daily Times:

You said in a 2005 interview with us that what Al Qaeda and the Taliban are doing in Pakistan is haram. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last sixteen months also haram?
Sufi Muhammad: Yes, I said that about Al Qaeda, but not about the Taliban. Let me say…that debate on past happenings is disallowed in Islam. A hadith sharif says, what has happened in the past should not be discussed.

Your Ad Here
But how can we proceed without debating the past?
The hadith sharif says a Muslim should not discuss past happenings because he may not remember all the [details] and, therefore, he may…sin by not speaking the truth.

A majority of Swat residents do not think the peace deal recently signed between the TNSM and the NWFP government will last long.
God Almighty does everything; he builds and destroys countries.

Residents also doubt whether peace is possible in the presence of armed Taliban.
Everyone keeps weapons. People in Peshawar have weapons with them.

You support keeping weapons?
Yes, you can keep weapons with you.

Did you ask Fazlullah to surrender weapons after the sharia law deal?
Keeping weapons is halal in Islam.

President Zardari said recently that force would be used if the Taliban do not surrender weapons in Swat.
His statement is childish…immature.

With sharia law in Swat, there will be a complete ban on music and girls’ education, and people will be forced to grow beards?
There are five subjects — judiciary, politics, economics, education and the executive. The judicial subject will be with us, the rest is beyond our control.

The Taliban are kidnapping government officials and killing soldiers, yet you still hold the army responsible for ceasefire violations.
Kidnapping cases are taking place all over the world. The military violated the ceasefire.

The military says some of its soldiers were shot dead while bringing water.
No. This is not the case. The soldiers were not killed near any stream.

Are soldiers moving freely in Swat after the peace deal?
No. The military cannot move freely unless peace is restored.

After peace is restored, will the army leave Swat?
This is Pakistan’s army and Swat is within Pakistan’s borders. I will have no objection if a military cantonment is established here.

Locals say innocent people have been killed. Will the aggrieved families be able to get justice?
I have told you already: we will not discuss what has happened in the past. Sharia law does not allow this.

If a court summons a key Taliban commander, will he appear before the court?
If Caliph Umar (RA) can appear before a court, then why can’t others?

So Fazlullah will also appear in court if summoned?
If he does not… he will be acting against the sharia law.

What you did in Malakand in the 1990s and then in Afghanistan in 2001 you called ‘jihad’. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last 16 months in Swat also jihad?
I do not want to speak on this.

What are Fazlullah’s plans after the peace deal?
He will support imposition of sharia law.

You have termed democracy ‘infidelity’. But Maulana Sami-ul Haq, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Qazi Hussain Ahmad are taking part in the democratic process.
Democracy is not permissible in sharia law. I will not name [these leaders] but they are taking part in infidelity. I will not offer prayers if one of [these leaders] is leading those prayers.

Do you intend to export sharia law to other parts of Pakistan?
If people help me, I will. Otherwise, no.

671 responses to “Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat”

  1. Bloody Civilian says:

    ANP (which is a civililan, political party, not an armed group) has lost more than a hundred people just in Swat. Leaders like Alam Zeb and others across the NWFP have been killed. Afzal Khan, despite losing half his family and being shot twice himself, remains the only sign of resistance (alas, this old man’s brave stand has failed to have any effect at all on the Pakistani conscience). The Army has continued to lose ground for two years now. It has failed to protect the people of Swat. It has effectively surrendered. Islamabad has offered no help or encouragement to the people of Swat or of NWFP. The PPP has been more interested in expanding the cabinet in Islamabad, and adding the Punjab cabinet to their power to extend patronage (rather than build political consensus through honest action).

    May be the army (or elements therein) does see these ‘jihadis’ as an asset – a paramilitary force on the cheap. May be PML(N) see both the armed and unarmed mullahs as its constituency. May be many people in Pakistan want Sharia Law and are neither prepared nor able to question the contents too much. They are obviously not prepared to march to Swat to rescue the half a million *Pakistani* girls there… the way they were prepared to march to Constitution Avenue. The media see the capitulation to this mad man (and his madder son-in-law and his even madder men/beasts) variously as ‘what the people want’, ‘this is our own people’, ‘this is america’s war’, ‘the only option left for peace’.

    This is the End of Time for Swat. Sufi has said that there is no need for the President to sign the ‘instrument of surrender’. He has already declared Year Zero (Pol Pot style, except he quotes a hadith to declare the past haram!). Those who think this will not spillover to the rest of Pakistan have their heads firmly burried in the sand. This is an ideology. It cannot be stopped by “plugging four bridges over the Indus” (as apathetically and idiotically claimed by Gen. Hamid Nawaz). Indeed, this ideology already exists in various parts of the country. The seed is already spread.

    It is difficult to say how state authority, once eroded, can be claimed back. History shows it to be nearly impossible. With even the people being confused if not guilty of equivocation, what hope is left. “Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.”

  2. Tazeen says:

    Oh boy, discussing past is haram. That would make any kind of jurisprudence haram. If you cannot discuss past, you can commit any crime and get away with it on this logic that you cannot discuss what happened in past.

    PRICELESS

  3. Nadeem says:

    .. such insane guyz can be controlled through insane measures.. Army must screw them up.. they are altering Islam to their own agendas.. the Islam they are imposing, simply disregarding the most authentic and natural religion..

  4. faisal says:

    This is the same guy who took hundreds of kids to “Jihad” in Afghanistan and got them killed, and then pleaded to the Govt. for his protection from the parents of those kids.

    I would say, instead of confronting them now, let them have it their way and contain them there. They don’t have any vision any plan or whatever, and they are cruel as hell. The more you confront them the more powerful and vicious they will become. People of Swat will pretty soon get very fed up with them.

    Lets face it, civil and military leadership has no clue how to deal with people who are fanatic enough to send 15-16 years old kids on suicide bombings.

  5. desi skeptic says:

    Discussing the past is not allowed in shariah???

    This is a first for me. And I am afraid that this will be far from the last of such absurdities that we will get to hear. And at some level, sadly, it doesn’t surprise me.

    Sincerely hoping for a better more saner future for Pakistan.

    Sigh.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*