The extremely well choreographed show is over and the performer is returning in the comfort of her dressing room in the air, with satisfaction writ all over. Indeed it was a command performance amply facilitated by the traditional Pakistani fervour and hospitality.
Hillary is a talent of all seasons and all occasions. Her just concluded act in Pakistan was a side of her rarely seen. She has carved her place in the performance domain leaving Sarah Palin far behind. Her eyes are clearly on a much cherished ball, unlike the Alaskan Hockey Mom who has succumbed to making hay and lots of money while the sun continues to shine.
The performances on the side of Pakistani groups and audiences must be equally recognised and credited. The head to head encounters with TV Anchors and Talk Show Hosts and another one with the all female TV Anchors; the open forum with youthful students of Government College University Lahore; the one-on-one TV interviews all showed a class act unexpected and unknown of Pakistani civil society. In all these groups’ relatively younger persons and in particular the younger women were shining and that is a tremendous signal of hope for the future.
The fact that Hillary’s handlers focussed on these groups also shows the perceptions the Americans have about Pakistani civil society. Absent were the talking heads of the print media who have squirreled their way into the high-tech electronic media of modern times but lack the ability to think on their feet and speak convincingly and coherently in real-time live telecasts. It also confirmed in stark reality, the disconnect Pakistan’s establishment shows towards these groups – the youth; the women and the new breed of media names and faces.
While at times Hillary was caught fleet-footed in her response, her counterparts also often showed a degree of timidity, particularly when she offered empty goal posts where the follow-up questions went a begging. One such opportunity was when she pronounced that the aid to Egypt and Israel approved by the US Congress had similar requirements; she should have been challenged if the kind of language of KLB existed in the legislation for aid to these countries as well. Another occasion when she rhetorically stated that Pakistan can always refuse this aid, she should have been reminded that “true friendships” avoid such entreaties.
She walked into lion’s dens and hornet’s nests single handedly and unsupported by aides or embassy experts and faced everything head-on. She went to the business world tycoons, the lawyers, the saints and sages, the opposition politicians and ceremonial government occasions undeterred and apparently unprotected and, defended her American positions as one would expect of her. There she also spoke with alacrity and coherence on issues intrinsic to Pakistan that none of the political leadership or intellectuals dare touch upon in such manner and given the short time at her disposal.
The Secretary of State was bright-eyed and bubbling upon landing in Islamabad. At the end of three days of Blitz her face and demeanour betrayed tiredness. But there was also present therein the unmistakable hallow of a catharsis - a Mona-Lisa like smile of satisfaction.
It was also clear from her pronouncements as she went along her journey that she was changing her understanding and perceptions of Pakistan and the dynamism of its people. That’s where rest the core and mutual benefits of her visit.
I think she indeed did a great job, for one she showed Pakistanis the other side of picture. I was shocked to know that US had spent far more aid on IDPs then the rest of so called friendly countries put together. She tried to change the Pakistani attitude and I think she gave enough food for thought to those who rationalize before pronouncing judgments.
At GCU where she did not give an answer she did ask a question in return, which, considerably diluted the accusations being implied in the questions.
US might not be our friend but its the closest thing to a friend we have.
Yahood (jews)and Nusra(chritsians) cant be your friends AL-QURAN
i am agreed with “confused”. The punch line from the writeup is missing. The way how we cope up with Hillary as youth was outstanding, but did hillary stood head to head against Pakistan’s youth ? well say no, there was not single appropriate answer against any of the query put up by Govt College Students. The purpose of Pakistan and US behind war against terrorism is totally different. Many issue are un answered and Still Pakistan’ Nation is in confused state. Same was showed in the writeup.
Thanks.
What a confusing and unnecessary post.
I think overall she did a good job; certainly from the American perspective she accomplished her mission. However, the real question is whether we, i.e. the Pakistani government, did a professional job.
I think her interview with senior journalists was quite good, and many poignant questions were posed. However, I must say that the interview with women journalists was disappointing because lesser-known participants were chosen, a couple of whom came across as being quite unprofessional. I think they should have chosen more rational people like Naseem Zehra, etc.
A realistic study of Clinton’s visit. I guess this was expected. Clinton is a fighter and almost won the Presidency. Lack of challenges to her statements could be explained as realpolitik. Some times you have to stay quiet. Pakistan is in a situation where it is better not to antagonize someone of Clinton’s stature since there are irate neighbors all around and an internal war in progress.
Very nice writeup. Even funny.
It was a good ’show’.
But will anything come out of it. Probably not. The distrust is too deep.
What is your point? what are you trying to convey? this piece went over my head. was there a message that I missed?