Custom Search

The Shoania Phenomenon: Why is There So Much Fuss Over the Shoaib and Sania?

Posted on April 30, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, People, Society, Sports
33 Comments
Total Views: 77125

Share

Adil Najam

The question mark in the headline is a real question mark. I am not suggesting that there should have been no fuss about Pakistani cricket star Shoaib Malik marrying India tennis star Sania Mirza. I am wondering why there has been as much fuss as there has.

""""""""""""""""""

I ask this because I really would like to know why you think it has been so.



Over the last many many days we have received over twenty different emails asking us to do a post about the so-called "Shoania" phenomenon. To be fair, it has been amusing to see the hysteria grow; and even more amusing to see it being fueled by a flabbergasted media that seemed even more out-of-control than the hysteria itself.

We did not do a post till now because we really did not know what we would say beyond echoing the hysteria or simply wishing the young couple well in their betrothal. Although we do wish the couple well and our fondest prayers go with them and their future, we are not particularly keen in doing the first (even though we may well be doing it now!)

We write now because it seems that things have finally begun to settle down. The "dancing on the streets" have ended. The hysteria is subsiding. And our dear friends in the media have somewhat come to their senses and realized that the world remains as complex a place as ever and Pakistan is no less messed up today than it was when this bout of Shoania first broke.

Maybe now is the time to ask the more interesting question: Why was there so much fuss made about Shoania?

I can understand the celebrity and glitterati have rhythms of their own which us mere mortals cannot understand. But I cannot remember any celebrity wedding in Pakistan that has ever generated the type of hype that Shoania did. The closest we have come before this is the wedding of Imran Khan to Jemima. And even that was not in the same league as this.

The question is, why?

Was it because these are two great sporting stars? (Except that, at least in Pakistan, few knew or cared much about Sania or about tennis before this, and other cricketers as popular as Shoaib never received such a reaction). Was it because it was a Pakistani citizen marrying an Indian citizen? (Even though that happens quite routinely). Was it because the glitter of celebrity was mixed with the spice of scandal even as the news broke? Was it because our public is so fed up with "serious" stuff that such a distraction was not just good entertainment but highly welcomed? Was it the extremist politicians across the border who actually made this news? Was it the media that created a big story because they more than anyone else benefit from a big story? Was it all of the above? A combination of the above? Or none of the above?

One last thought before I ask you to respond. Maybe, it does not matter at all that this fuss was made. But the fact is that the fuss was made. And made at proportions never seen before. I suspect that in figuring out why we will not find anything new or even interesting about either Shoaib Malik or about Sania Mirza, but we may find some interesting clues about ourselves as a society. Ultimately, that is what I am looking for here.

Newt Gingrich Viewed as Republican Freshmen’s Puppet see here newt gingrich bio

NPR All Things Considered December 22, 1995 00-00-0000 One commentator sees Newt Gingrich as being out of step with the agenda of Republican freshmen in the House. The speaker of the house should be seen as the House leader, but Newt can’t seem to find his crown.

ROBERT SIEGEL, Host: More on the speaker from Boston and commentator Mickey Edwards. He says Newt Gingrich’s low numbers may be due in part to a misperception of the role of the speaker.

MICKEY EDWARDS, Commentator: For the past year, as Newt Gingrich’ s Congress operated like an assembly line, whipping out various parts of its Contract With America, political observers have watched with their mouths open. This was Newt’s army and it was marching in lockstep, but that was not a good reading of what was happening then and it’ s certainly not a good reading of what’s happening now.

House Republicans were united on the big issues in their contract, but all along this has been a much more diverse group, made up of fairly moderate committee chairmen, very conservative freshmen, and a leadership team, including Newt Gingrich, that was running fast to stay in front of the troops. Sometimes the leaders don’t run quite fast enough. That’s what happened this week when Gingrich and Bob Dole came to some sort of a budget agreement with the president, only to have those first and second term House Republicans call the speaker on the carpet and tell him to forget it. It wasn’t the first time, either. Gingrich considers himself an environmentalist, but when he tried to head off some of the cuts in EPA funding, it was the more extreme freshmen who called the shots, not the speaker.

But Newt Gingrich has never been the shaper of the conservative agenda. His talent is in following, listening, finding out where the troops want to go and figuring a way to get them there. As he learned again this week, when he starts leading instead of following, he may well turn around and find that his troops are marching off in another direction. newtgingrichbio.com newt gingrich bio

Newt Gingrich has had an awful month or two. First, he had to learn when not to speak, then there was that awful Time Magazine cover with the blotches and stubble, and the nasty reminders that, sure, he may be the man of the year, but so was Saddam Hussein. But if Newt is beginning to feel a little like Rodney Dangerfield, the problem may not be so much in the newsrooms as in his own ranks, where he’ s allowed to lead only as long as he leads where he’s told to.

ROBERT SIEGEL: Mickey Edwards is a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma. He now teaches at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and comes to us by way of member station WGBH in Boston.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

33 comments posted

Comment Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

  1. oops says:
    June 4th, 2010 1:16 am

    Kyunke 18th Ammendment passed. Big Achievement of PPP. So to distract people. Shaadi. Aur baad baad mein Akram Sheikh/Supremecourt .. Haq Haq HAQ!

Comment Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All



Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!