Guest Post by Aisha Sarwari
“This is why I am not in favor of working women.” Said the Colonel and security in-charge of one of Lahore’s largest office blocks. “Excuse me?” I said.
Before I could unleash my monologue on the tirade of women’s mobility, I am interrupted by the drama unfolding in the Colonel’s office where two security guards, a police man, a fellow plaza worker and the culprit who “teased” me shift uncomfortably in their chairs.
A few moments ago, I was walking up the stairs from the parking lot, late for a board meeting, shoving my car keys in my ancient purse, while two men who appeared to have camaraderie with each other were coming down. As they passed me, the uglier guy with glasses greeted me with strange familiarity and boldness.
I was used to the whistling, the smirks, the humming of latest Bollywood songs or even a religious proclamation of how great God is. But this sort of thing, however, had me stop and take notice. I asked for a clarification from him, and he went on to make generally trivial chit-chat about his friend giving me a call later.
Understanding full well that chauvinists thrive on women’s passivity, I learned to give in to my indignity and forgo the fight of telling random men off. Sometimes even when I want to fight back, their timing is too perfect and their precision that of a seasoned actor on Broadaway. Before I can feel the stab of inferiority and their power to communicate a stark message, they are gone, under the folds of a society that is so sickly South Asian. Everyday it is a battle, but I trivialize the over-sexualization of a partially segregated society whose religion rests on a mother/whore dichotomy. It’s nothing, I say, not worth it. But the truth is its very bloody and it wounds me each time and it leaves its mark every time it happens.
So this time, I fought back. I called for two guards who were directing traffic in the underground basement. New at their job, they refused to budge because they didn’t have “orders” to move from the spot that both of them were designated on to stand. I couldn’t believe it. This was no time for bureaucracy. Exasperated, but still somewhat in control, I let the guys flea, but I went to give the wannabe pedestal guards a piece of my mind. I could hear myself becoming a whiny powerless nagging woman. I hated it, but what could I do? I had to ask them why the hell they didn’t come when I called them, a total idiot just got away.
By then enough men, old men, young men, men with family values, men who believe women need protection and those who just wanted to watch a show from the other side had gathered to catch the “honor-less” folk. They asked me to identify the person. I found myself increasingly being part of a large Victorian drama — Damsels in Distress. I hated this too.
So due to cleaver James Bond action the men caught one of the guys who tried to get away. There was some motorbike skidding involved. Eventually the guy removes his helmet. I ask him if he was the person whose friend was attempting to be entertaining. He said yes and I proceeded to ask him why he was laughing about it and didn’t tell his friend to take a break. At which he became a local Punjabi Sultan Rahi and stopped short of beating his baboon chest, mouth foaming action and all. He asked me who the hell I was to tell him anything, that I should shut up and know my place. I went ahead and told him to talk in English after he learned the language, and also that I was now going to make him regret what he just did.
Thanks to his daring proximity the thought of slapping him did come to mind, but why should I lie, I was scared of him. Taken by the nerve to be so aggressive toward me in front of a crowd of armed guards, I didn’t want to test which of the genders has a knack for violence, it was a well discovered territory for all women.
I took a deep breath and called for Mr. Pathan, the chief security guard who in the true sense of the word was a guard. He arrived on the scene with his 3 inch by 6 inch mustache folded towards the edges in a circle loop. Once he arrived, he grabbed the lad with his neck asked the rest of his supervisors to take care of the bike while he walked briskly toward the Colonel’s office, asked the girl to follow. Once he discovered the girl was me (He thinks I am Syed), he broke into a fit of ass-whopping of the lad, where he asserted who exactly possessed the lion’s mane and where he was in the food chain. This was his territory and there was some order here. The kicking, shoving and slaps continued two floors up via the car slopes and into the office.
I greeted the colonel who was kind enough to keep a reserved parking space for me for the past few months, “because I was a woman” after a couple of vandalism incidents with my car. We sat down and I narrated what happened. The fellow plaza worker talked about what he saw. When I gave my version, I knew I could never explain the concept of “perceived threat” and how much that can terrify a person. It is the unsaid rule that if you dare to report, or take action it’ll be marked as a protest against the status quo and there will be retaliation, and the last word won’t be yours.
The Colonel said that it is hard for these guys to differentiate between the “type” of women they see. Some women hold men’s hand in the parking lot. What he meant to say was, this was a simple case of miscalculation. You lady, are a married woman, with kids, I know your boss, your husband and so via the men associated with you, you deserve respect and I’ll punish these men accordingly.
Already the guy, thanks to Mr. Pathan’s mighty blows was a lamb, apologizing profusely after he heard the police man suggest jail, where he’d eventually call in his friend and settle the score. I asked him to define what he was sorry for, and it was quiet clear he was sorry about landing in the crap that he found himself in, not for the harm caused to me. The fellow plaza office worker, though harsh with the guy, was ultimately asking me to forgive and let him go. Men, after all have to protect other men, it was harmless, understandably a misjudgment that should not get you in so much trouble for. You can get into trouble for theft, murder and burglary but this is just a woman.
The Colonel asked me. What do you want to do?
Men oppress women because that’s how it is. Its more natural for a woman to clean shoes apparently than it is for a man, that is in women’s nature, the cooking, cleaning and the menial tasks the surround child rearing, as well as the overwhelmingly huge ones that need emotional strength of an elephant, business intelligence of a working woman and those that require spiritual stability and nurturing forgiveness. All this time, no one asked us what we want to do.
Colonel Saab, I want him and his friend to know, that sometimes you can pick on the wrong woman, a pissed off one. Can you do that please? I asked him.
He placed his cigar on the ashtray and sighed.
Artwork by Abro.




















































I have lived in the West for 2/3rd of my life (40 years). I have not met one Pakitani woman in these 40 years who wanted to go back to Pakistan. At least 50 percent of the husbands had a desire to move back to Pakistan. This is inspite of the fact that they could have all kinds of Naukar Chowker in Pakistan and here in the West they have to work hard. This in itself tells me how difficult it is for woman to live in Pakistan. Of course there may be exceptions.
yes, but Akif, women work at the lower levels and in low paying jobs, and they are more apt to do this because they need to work part time for many years (because they still have child care to worry about) and hence cannot move higher. Other than that your point is well taken.
” The wage gap is real ”
sorry, it’s kind of off topic but the concept of the wage gap in the US is utter nonsense. It’s another one of those statistical illusion thrown around by special interest groups. I have about 900 employees working in my company; I can’t even imagine offering a woman less money for the same job that a man does. It’s against the law !
Misbah is also partly right, however. Domestic abuse is a prosecutable crime in most developed countries, and so is sexual harrassment. The wage gap is real but what is it in Pakistan? Women are either not working for any pay or they are menials. There are a few exceptions, who stand out because of their rarity. This is the case in the West also, but it is more pronounced in poor countries generally.
Desi I. is also partly right. In the case of Saudi Arabia we have a very rich country, devloped in the technical sense, which has a dismal record of upholding women’s rights.
However it is only in the second half of the last century that we have even been having the discussion. So overall I feel the situation is hopeful.
If Pakistan really takes up the cause of women and seriously works to assure their advancement, Pakistan will reap many rewards from this generally. Malaysia is possibly a good model. It has provided education for girls and encouraged them to enter the workforce on all levels, and the benefits have been enormous. Of course progress has not been perfect there, but it has been very encouraging. They don’t get weighted down with the whole burqa argument either, yet the dress of Malaysian women would not offend any Muslim. So there are many possibilities if only we would look around us.
Misbah:
[quote comment=”49515″]Rights of women is always a good indicator of social development. We need to think about this.[/quote]
Hmmm… interesting, but I am not too sure about this.
So first, I will ask: when you say “social development,” do you mean it in the World Bank sense (GDP/GNP, basically the value of goods)which is solely economic (and then tries to tell us that somehow, a high GDP/GNP equals a high rate of “democracy,” well-being, and so on)? Or do you mean in the human development index definition?
If you mean it in the economic sense, then I’m not sure whether that directly corresponds to the rights of women, and more importantly, the equality of women IN PRACTICE.
Take the US for example: technically, we have laws that guarantee equality. Yet women still make about 60 cents for every dollar that a man in her position makes. Furthermore, the rates of domestic abuse, sexual harrassment, and so on are frighteningly high. This is why I think it’s not always feasible to use socio-economic standing.
In other words, having a high “social development” factor doesn’t really mean that the ladkha on the street (or elsewhere) won’t molest/harrass/etc you.
***
For those of you who are interested in reading a report on “women’s status” in the world, check out the UN report:
http://www.un-instraw.org/en/docs/SG/VAWStudy-Summ ary-EN.pdf