Muzammil Shah and the Gun Battle at Lal Masjid

Posted on July 10, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, Politics, Religion, Society
278 Comments
Total Views: 95078

Adil Najam

The news is developing by the moment. But the bottom-line is clear. The security forces have taken control of the Lal Masjid from militants after a severe gun-battle. But the story is far from over.

It will continue to unfold. There are too many unanswered questions. They will certainly be asked and discussed threadbare; here at ATP and elsewhere. But the real story of tomorrow remains the same as the real story of yesterday. Can a society that is so deeply divided against itself learn the lessons of tolerance? This question will continue to haunt us well into the future, in multiple shapes, in multiple forms, in multiple contexts.

This is a question that we at ATP have confronted from our very beginning and will continue to confront. But now is not the time to ponder on this. Even though what has happened had become inevitable over the last many days, I am too heartbroken to be able to do so.

Right now I can think only of Muzammil Shah (photo, from Associated Press, above). This photo was taken as he waited for his son who was inside the Lal Masjid. I do not know whether his son was there voluntarily, or as hostage. But I do know what the look of Muzammil Shah’s face means. The more important question is whether his son came out alive or not. I pray that he did.

Analysts – me included – will discuss what happened at length. They will try to understand the meaning of all this. What does this mean for Pakistan politics? What does this mean for Gen. Musharraf’s future? What does this mean for Islam? For Democracy? Does the fault lie with Abdul Rashid Ghazi and his militant supporters for creating a situation that could only end this way? Why did he not surrender? Is the blood of everyone who died not on his head for his stubboness and arrogance? Or, maybe, it is the government that is to blame because it did not act earlier? Act differently? Waited just a few days more for a negotiated solution?

Right now all these questions seem really petty and small. This is not the time for scoring cheap political points. This is not the time for spin.

Moreover, there are too many questions to ask. To answer. The head hurts as you think of them. But the heart hurts even more as you look at the face of Muzammil Shah.

Maybe the only really important question is the one that you can read between his wrinkles: “Why? Oh God, why? Why must things happen this way?”

278 responses to “Muzammil Shah and the Gun Battle at Lal Masjid”

  1. MadSufi.com says:

    Dan, the fact that you ask people wether they’ve ever seen a “Mullah” do any good, shows that you are ignorant and not brought up in a pious environment. I know many goodhearted “Mullahs” and you would too if you strengthen your ties with Sufism in Pakistan…

  2. Fareed says:

    The whole episode of Lal Masjid is the consequence of the policies pursued during the Zia Islamist Phase. This also reflects on the unwillingness of the powerful military establishment to take on these extremists with a straight bat. Even during this episode questions, which have remained unanswered, have been riased about the continuing links between the Lal Masjid People and the intellegence agencies.

    The real solution to these problems is not operations like this but the complete disentaglement of the military from the decision making process especially the foriegn policy issues and reigning of intellegence agencies who by some accounts have become a state within a state

  3. Adil Najam says:

    Since someone had asked, my NPR radio (in show ‘On Point’) interview on Pakistan situation (not just Lal Masjid) can be heard here:
    http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2007/07/20070710 _a_main.asp

    We also got a nice plug for ATP on their website, which was good ;-)

  4. SJH says:

    Yes this is a time to be reflective and to be sad at the face of a worried father. Surely poverty and powerlessness does not diminish one’s anxiety as a parent. But before we rush to condemn this poor father we should remember that such moralizing is not relevant to the poor. Maybe I am different from the many others who have posted their thoughts above. I am teary eyed at the loss of innocent life but sadness can beget hope and provide a reckless energy that can sweep away strong structures. Now is not the time for those who love this country to be tired, now is the time for strength and toughness; do not let down the father pictured above.

  5. osman says:

    make sure they dont cover up the women and girls killed to protect their image.

    Its imperative the truth be know.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*