Musharraf Gets Votes, But Loses Big Time

Posted on October 6, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, Politics
119 Comments
Total Views: 59524

Adil Najam

UPDATE: The picture on the left, published in Daily Times, comes with the caption:

“Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz, Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri, PML-Q President Shujaat Hussain and MNAs react to an announcement by the Election Commissioner (unseen), at Parliament on Saturday. President Pervez Musharraf won a landslide victory in the election but the official results will be declared after the Supreme Court verdict on his eligibility.

Maybe our readers can suggest what some of the people here are thinking as they clap. Suggestively, some, you will note, are making too much of an effort to clap, and others too little! The picture is also a good compliment to an earlier one we had posted here.

ORIGINAL POST: It is neither a surprise nor really news that Gen. Musharraf just got himself elected. It was always clear that he would get himself elected by hook or crook; eventually it took a bit of both. The way it had to be done is sad – pathetic really – and no one has come out of this mess looking good. Gen. Musharraf got the votes he needed, but neither he nor anyone else is a winner.

Gen. Musharraf lost whatever little credibility he might have had as someone interested in Pakistan’s development or people’s aspirations. He also lost the ability to make the claim that he was any different or any less power-hungry than his political predecessors. He is now, clearly, one of them and has lost the one thing that had given him a support base. Benazir Bhutto lost the principles her party and father might once have stood for. PML(Q) had little to loose and yet lost big, they may even loose the government. Nawaz Sharif had already lost out some weeks ago. Maulana Fazlur Rehman had already lost all credibility but now they can’t even pretend to have any left. The Supreme Court lost at least some of the public goodwill they had gained as an institution with last minute shenanigans. America lost too because instead of backing one bad bet (Musharraf) they are now backing two (Musharraf + Benazir Bhutto).

But the biggest loser here may be the people of Pakistan who – once again – lost big time. But, then, I guess we are used to it.

Frankly, there is little need or point in commenting on the sham elections today. This was not a news event, this was a scripted stage drama. The real question remains what will happen next. There, it seems, that all of the losers – including Gen. Musharraf – may be confronted with some unexpected turn of events. There, one continues to hope, the people of Pakistan may yet emerge as winners eventually. Whenever ‘eventually’ comes!

119 responses to “Musharraf Gets Votes, But Loses Big Time”

  1. Rafay Kashmiri says:

    Razia,

    No one has doubt about Mussharaf’s very
    little achievements, significant or not, not at all, to please
    the world’s agenda. All the achievements are due to the
    serious Pakistanis citizens cooperation and patriotism, not
    the group of ninkumpoops around him.
    The opposition boycotted as a token of protest against
    corruption, nepotism, dishonesty, hanky panky, and cheap
    arguments. I hail the attitude of the opposition.

    Quranic indication,

    When people become corrupt and bad, we impose on them,
    Hakims, who are even worst than them.

    Now we don’t say other than, Musharaf is patriotic, not
    corrupt, straight forward, hardworking etc. what I am worried about him is his potential Islamophbic secularism.
    Not good for National Identity, moral corruption will be a disastor for entire generation of today.
    He must get rid now of the lotas, commun thugs turned
    politicians and colonial zurriats.

  2. Social Mistri says:

    O Ahsan Bhaijan, Allah ka wasta hay revolution apnay paas hi rakhien. Anparh mulk mein revolution say aap ko kya milay ga. Let’s ensure that we first get to a stage where when we execute on a revolution, we know what we’re looking for! Abhi to khirkia’n tootein gi and Danish-Cartoon-Multiplied-By-1000 wala kaam ho jaey ga. You don’t really want a revolution. Trust me. What you want is for the KSE to be at 20,000. And when I say “you”, I really mean, “me” :-) OGDC, Bank Alfalah zindabad!!!

  3. iFaqeer says:

    And in terms of the inquilab, as I said 13 or so years ago…yaa tho iss qaum ko aqal aajay ya ghairath aaja’ey; iss say pehlay kay in koe ghussa aa’ey. Otherwise we do get what we got in Iran, the Soviet revolution…

    I am also with Kruman. But who will bell the cat?

  4. iFaqeer says:

    I am somewhere between Adil, Social Mistri, Umar Shah, Roshan, and Beej Kumar. I want to be optimistic; but I find it hard to be so in the short-to-medium term. Iss hammam main sub nangay hain; all 5,6,7 parties are imperfect: Mush, BB, MQM, PML N, PML, Q, the Justices, … and not least We, The People.

    And in terms of having a real impact on the ground (as opposed to the media) or having a solution to the problem, Imran Khan and the TI are but a footnote. Notwithstanding his own “honesty” and, more importantly in my book, the sincerity and passion of a lot of the people who support him. And for the sake of these last, I wish it weren’t true, but that’s the fact from where I sit.

    And the funny thing is, on the positive side, each of those “parties” (and I mean party to the situation, not political party) also have at least one very solid principled point to make…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*