Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat

Posted on March 19, 2009
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, People, Politics
67 Comments
Total Views: 95081

Adil Najam

As the politics of intrigue and rumor heats up, even more, in Pakistan and after the recent dramatic political events, the news of Pakistan’s most important existential battle – against the extremism of the Taliban and their ilk – seems to have slid off the front pages.

Yet, a news item in The News reminds us that the murderous militants are now setting their eyes towards District Dir, after gaining control of Swat. One got a better glimpse into the mind of one of the key players in the Swat saga, Sufi Mohammed, in an interview given to Daily Times’ Peshawar Bureau Chief Iqbal Khattak. Speaking in Mingora, the 74 year-old father-in-law of militant leader Fazlulah gives many important glimpses into his own thinking and priorities.

Here is the interview published in Daily Times:

You said in a 2005 interview with us that what Al Qaeda and the Taliban are doing in Pakistan is haram. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last sixteen months also haram?
Sufi Muhammad: Yes, I said that about Al Qaeda, but not about the Taliban. Let me say…that debate on past happenings is disallowed in Islam. A hadith sharif says, what has happened in the past should not be discussed.

Your Ad Here
But how can we proceed without debating the past?
The hadith sharif says a Muslim should not discuss past happenings because he may not remember all the [details] and, therefore, he may…sin by not speaking the truth.

A majority of Swat residents do not think the peace deal recently signed between the TNSM and the NWFP government will last long.
God Almighty does everything; he builds and destroys countries.

Residents also doubt whether peace is possible in the presence of armed Taliban.
Everyone keeps weapons. People in Peshawar have weapons with them.

You support keeping weapons?
Yes, you can keep weapons with you.

Did you ask Fazlullah to surrender weapons after the sharia law deal?
Keeping weapons is halal in Islam.

President Zardari said recently that force would be used if the Taliban do not surrender weapons in Swat.
His statement is childish…immature.

With sharia law in Swat, there will be a complete ban on music and girls’ education, and people will be forced to grow beards?
There are five subjects — judiciary, politics, economics, education and the executive. The judicial subject will be with us, the rest is beyond our control.

The Taliban are kidnapping government officials and killing soldiers, yet you still hold the army responsible for ceasefire violations.
Kidnapping cases are taking place all over the world. The military violated the ceasefire.

The military says some of its soldiers were shot dead while bringing water.
No. This is not the case. The soldiers were not killed near any stream.

Are soldiers moving freely in Swat after the peace deal?
No. The military cannot move freely unless peace is restored.

After peace is restored, will the army leave Swat?
This is Pakistan’s army and Swat is within Pakistan’s borders. I will have no objection if a military cantonment is established here.

Locals say innocent people have been killed. Will the aggrieved families be able to get justice?
I have told you already: we will not discuss what has happened in the past. Sharia law does not allow this.

If a court summons a key Taliban commander, will he appear before the court?
If Caliph Umar (RA) can appear before a court, then why can’t others?

So Fazlullah will also appear in court if summoned?
If he does not… he will be acting against the sharia law.

What you did in Malakand in the 1990s and then in Afghanistan in 2001 you called ‘jihad’. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last 16 months in Swat also jihad?
I do not want to speak on this.

What are Fazlullah’s plans after the peace deal?
He will support imposition of sharia law.

You have termed democracy ‘infidelity’. But Maulana Sami-ul Haq, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Qazi Hussain Ahmad are taking part in the democratic process.
Democracy is not permissible in sharia law. I will not name [these leaders] but they are taking part in infidelity. I will not offer prayers if one of [these leaders] is leading those prayers.

Do you intend to export sharia law to other parts of Pakistan?
If people help me, I will. Otherwise, no.

67 responses to “Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat”

  1. Hussain says:

    Mr. Watan Aziz, I am afraid you are the one who is acting like the “ignorant educated” or as you say elsewhere the snobbish “bau”.

    The poor Daily Times reporter from Peshawar who took the interview (and probably risked his life doing so) is nearly certainly less of a “bau” than those reading or writing here. If you cannot thank him for doing the interview and sharing it with armchair know-alls like yourself, at least have the decency to stay quiet.

    No offense meant, but ver-analysis of this sort is usually a sign that you need an “analysts” help :-)

  2. Watan Aziz says:

    Ignorance Meets More Ignorance

    There are three kinds of interviews; a press release interview; a Q&A (challenge) interview and an ignorant interviewer interviewing and equally ignorant interviewee.

    This is an exhibit #1 of the third (the ignorant) type. These kinds of interviews always make me wonder who is more ignorant, the interviewee or the interviewer? Heads, you win; tails, you win.

    ~~Locals say innocent people have been killed. Will the aggrieved families be able to get justice?
    I have told you already: we will not discuss what has happened in the past. Sharia law does not allow this.

    If a court summons a key Taliban commander, will he appear before the court?
    If Caliph Umar (RA) can appear before a court, then why can

  3. Aamir Ali says:

    People are moving back to Swat because of the temporary peace that this “peace agreement” has brought. Its not like Swatis are wealthy people with multiple homes in other parts of Pakistan.

    Sufi Mohammed has never won an election and operates through threats and force. That is not called “support of the people”.

  4. Gorki says:

    @ Drone
    Your post and your way of thinking should be discouraging to any friend of Pakistan to say the least. You make a case for allowing Sufi Mohammad a free hand in Swat lest his successors are even worse than him. You claim America desires to dismember Pakistan and the above deal is necessary to preserve Pakistan.

    I ask you a rhetorical question; what is it that makes America, Pakistan, or for that matter any nation worth saving from dismemberment; worth fighting for, worth dying for?

    Consider how America answered this question. It fought its bloodiest war fighting for a principle that it was morally reprehensible to hold anyone; black or white in subjugation. That civil war brought America, then a young nation to the brink of bankruptcy and dismemberment yet it fought on till it prevailed. It was then led by a man who is today worshiped like a minor deity by his country. His biggest achievement, in his own words was that

  5. Mohsin says:

    Whats the solution of this problem ? Instead of discussing the terror of Taliban and Government’s failure , why cant we suggest some possible solutions.? Use of force is certainly NOT the ideal one. Do we have any other quick solution?
    If people of Sawat are not supporting Sufi Muhammad then why the hell they are moving back to Sawat from the refugee camps?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*