I Admire Imran. But Cannot Support His Politics.

Posted on June 1, 2009
Filed Under >Aqil Sajjad, People, Politics
105 Comments
Total Views: 78980

Aqil Sajjad

Like many Pakistanis, I admire Imran Khan and his sincerity. But supporting him politically is a different matter. He and his party – Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) – have some serious soul searching to do before people give it their political support.

Imran Khan is one of the few principled politicians we have. There is no doubt that he truly cares about the country. His bold stance on May 12 and his consistent support for the restoration of the judiciary was unmatched by any other prominent politician. His cancer hospital and the projects he has started in the field of education have been praised even by many of his critics.

Someone like myself, who is dissatisfied with the politics and corruption of the leading parties, is naturally attracted to Imran Khan who talks about principles and accountability. However, as much as I like Imran for his honesty and devotion to the country, I have some concerns about him and can not help agreeing with Shafqat Mahmood’s statement that Imran never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

Being politically inclined, I have even considered joining PTI at times, but reservations about his politics prevent me from doing so.

Imran Khan has been in politics for 13 years, and this is a long enough period to develop the party into a vibrant, democratic entity. Unfortunately, PTI still comes across more like an Imran Khan fan club rather than a democratic political party. For the most part, there is an absence of grass roots forums that meet regularly where any party member can raise issues and be heard, and the party line almost completely comes from the top.

Secondly, Imran does not realize that politics requires an appropriate mix of idealism and pragmatism and confuses this balancing act with opportunism. If he wants to serve the people of Pakistan by coming into power, then his decisions should be geared towards that goal. He had an excellent opportunity to launch himself when Nawaz Sharif offered him 20 odd seats in 1997 and again when Musharraf was willing to help him become the prime minister. Instead of spurning these offers, he should have taken a few ministries and worked hard on demonstrating through performance that he was someone who could truly deliver if given a chance. This could have provided him with the impetus needed to launch PTI into a force capable of getting elected into power on its own and then implement its reform agenda.

This unwillingness to balance idealism and pragmatism also creates doubts about his ability to deliver even if he came into power some day. It makes one wonder whether he would really take a practical approach towards addressing the country’s problems.

On top of all this, Imran Khan has a very confused stance on the Taliban where he still falls well short of fully condemning them.

He has been very consistently and forcefully bashing the Americans in recent years but the same kind of condemnation for the Taliban has not been forthcoming. This sharp contrast, when the Taliban have killed many more Pakistanis than the American drones, and when they are directly trying to destroy the state structure to establish their own rule, is hard to understand. It has taken some strong criticism for Imran Khan to finally make a few “too little too late” statements criticizing the Taliban, whereas what one expects from a good leader is the ability to clearly identify and point out a problem well ahead of time.

His stance on the current situation in Swat has again left a lot to be desired. He first vehemently opposed the military operation but did not explain what the government should do when the Taliban break a peace agreement and keep on expanding into neighbouring districts as they blatantly did after the Swat deal. Only after coming under regular fire has he finally accepted that a military operation can also be an option. He rightly says that bombings should be avoided and the operation should be carefully targeted, but the national debate could have been more focused on discussing how military action can be carried out in a way that minimizes civilian suffering if he and others had not been creating confusion by insisting that there should never be an operation.

In yet another example of muddled thinking, he now argues that before sending the army, a group of politicians should have been allowed to go and try to convince the Taliban to abide by the Swat peace deal. This makes one wonder why he did not publically propose this in the days leading up to the operation and what he is trying to accomplish by undermining the military’s efforts now that the time for this idea has clearly passed.

I really admire Imran Khan for his sincerity, but these are some of the serious issues that he and his party have to come to grips with, before PTI can make serious headway in realizing its full potential.

105 responses to “I Admire Imran. But Cannot Support His Politics.”

  1. faraz says:

    WSD you said
    “@ Faraz: Without integrity you can very easily comporomise on your vision ( which after all is pretty subjective thing). here is a link to imran

  2. Eidee Man says:

    “I think Imran Khan realizes what a blunder it was to boycott the February 2008 elections.”

    I’m not sure if he realizes it, but yes, this was definitely a huge blunder. I remember making this point during the elections, and also that a very large number of people on this blog were vehemently against participation in the elections. I also think it is a huge loss for the PPP and for Pakistan that Aitzaz is not part of the structure.

  3. wsd says:

    Interesting comments by all.

    @ Faraz: Without integrity you can very easily comporomise on your vision ( which after all is pretty subjective thing). here is a link to imran’s vision for you.

    http://www.insaf.pk/AboutUs/Ideology/tabid/139/Def ault.aspx

    The next is his approach to FATA. Well to be honest we still have 19th century system in FATA .The FCR is the law of land( which actually means no law) and despite the fact that Gilani has announced to remove it is still in place. In fact what we are seeing in FATA is the collective failure of our foreign policy,civil administartion,intelligrnce agencies. War on terror has exposed us badly. In tis situation we need to be more careful brfore taking anyother action.But what we saw is totally opposite. We must ask why we needed this millitary action when our army is in these areas fro alst 6 yrs? This is a central question to this quagmire. This should have been discused in parliament ( which has become another non entity bcz of Zardari).Then the question arises what typeof millitary action, the present one or it could be more focused and sophisticated without mass exodus?What about the “taliban” produced as a result of this action?
    then waht about our “liberal taliban” for whome anyone opposing millitary action in good faith is pro taliban.They fail to distinguish the difference in talibna supporters vs adopting a more rational strategy for dealing with them and this is where Imran is termed as a pro taliban. By the way following lines are from PTI menifesto on FATA.

    “The outdated FATA administrative system will be done away with through appropriate amendments in the FCR based on the wishes of the people of FATA. .Powers in FATA shall be devolved to lower level in conformity with
    the system in the settled areas. .Party Act shall also be made applicable to FATA areas.”

    @ Aqil: CJ was atleast incharge of supreme court whereas Muharraf needed a dummy as PM. He even could not work with Jamali and needed someone like Shaukat Aziz ( no constituency, no interest in pakistan).
    @Nostalgic: Apart from your personal opinion if you can give some examples of true reformers who had less integrity and more pragamitism?

  4. Aamir Ali says:

    I think Imran Khan realizes what a blunder it was to boycott the February 2008 elections. That is why he is taking most controversial stands, such as against the current military operation versus Taliban aggressors. It results in him remaining in the news and awam still seeing him as a national political player.

    It’s a dangerous game he is playing and shows that like Nawaz Sharif, he is also just a politician, not a leader. If the Taliban were to ever seize power in Pakistan, they would hang Imran Khan for his playboy days before he became a closet mullah.

  5. Nostalgic says:

    I will take pragmatism over integrity any day if forced to choose between the two.

    I forget what the exact saying is, something about the worst of acts committed with the best of intentions, but it about sums it up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*