Custom Search

Another Dark Day, But Hope Persists

Posted on May 13, 2007
Filed Under >Fawad, Politics, Society
179 Comments
Total Views: 22958

Share

Guest Post by Fawad

The details emerging out of Pakistan are still somewhat sketchy but some facts are clear; more than 30 people are dead and over 115 injured. The Chief Justice of Pakistan was unable to address the Sindh Bar Association and was forced to go back to Islamabad and the private television station Aaj TV, which has been in the forefront of covering pro-judiciary and anti-Musharraf protests, was attacked by armed gunmen. This is indeed another dark day in the checkered political history of Pakistan.

It is now well past time for the Musharraf regime to go. This government has now lost the last shreds of moral authority required to govern. I salute the men and women of the civil society of Pakistan and the courageous independent media who are leading this struggle for the supremacy of the law and freedom of expression at grave risk to their life and limb.

As tragic and sad as events in Karachi are, this political moment is of historic import for the people of Pakistan and even on this day of darkness I see some hope for a better future. Since the sacking of the CJP on March 9th, the heroic struggle of the lawyers has germinated greater democratic desire and decisively strengthened Pakistan’s civil society and its beleagured independent media.


In the face of relentless governmental coercion there have been heartwarming displays of peaceful resistance, none more evident than in the historic journey of Justice Chaudhry through the heart of Punjab. Those in Pakistan and abroad who desire an eventual constitutional democratic polity rooted in a rule of law have to be encouraged by these developments. The conclusion of this episode, however, remains highly uncertain because no political sagacity can be expected from those who have brought us to this pass.

This grassroots peoples’ movement has also forced the politicians of all hues to make a choice; they either stand on the side of the rule of law or for the perpetuation of a dangerously unstable, one-man military banana republic. Mainstream politicians (despite all their historical shortcomings) clearly seem to grasp the national mood and the King’s men who are standing up for the present dispensation to save their personal fiefdoms will hopefully pay a steep price whenever they face the electorate in a fair election.

MQM more clearly exposed itself today than it ever has in its sordid history (thanks to private TV channels). The party that started with great hopes, rooted in the educated middle classes has over the years just become a collection of vicious thugs. It is wielding its fascistic tactics on behalf of people who seem to believe they have a divine right to perpetual power and who originally nurtured this party as a counterweight to PPP. MQM has shown itself the mirror image of the worst of MMA; both groups want people to acquiesce to their ideologies by force. Neither believes in nor has any fundamental respect for a constitutional rule of law.

Pakistan stands at a critical juncture as it has so many times in its unfortunate 60 year independent history. I would urge all Pakistanis and their well wishers to lend thier support to the struggle of Pakistan’s revitalized civil society. Let’s hope that the forces of peaceful democratic activism led by the country’s courageous lawyers ultimately emerge victorious and we can close this latest chapter of the military’s recurring era of authoritarian and unconstitutional misrule without further human suffering.

Fawad is a California-based literati-at-large and writes the blog ‘Moments of Tranquility,’ where a version of this was first posted.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

179 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 2321 20 19 18 17 [16] 15 14 13 12 111 »

  1. Adnan Ahmad says:
    May 17th, 2007 2:11 pm

    “Having said that the biggest tragedy here is that the system has never been given the chance to self cleanse itself, before it could do that , some one or the other ( mostly the army ) took it upon themselves to save the country from disaster and in the process landed it into a bigger tragedy.”

    Don’t you think that bigger tragedy is unfolding itself as we speak?

    I do believe Imran is a lesser evil. In no way I will write a defence argument here for Mr. Khan even though with each day passing by he sounds more and more intelligent. While mentioning his world cup note and his reference to the hospital he was building for Lahore I am glad you didn’t mention his personal flaws because so few of our politicians have them.

    Keep up the hope for, to quote from shaw shank redemption, ‘hope is a good thing and no good thing ever dies.’

  2. ayesha sajid says:
    May 17th, 2007 1:46 pm

    Right , lets assume Imran Khan wins and becomes out next PM. Does his party have the support of the entire nation ? Does his party have the checks and balances that are the requirement of a democratic system of a party/government that will keep him in his place and not make a despot out of him ? Does he seem like a mature individuall who can take us out of the muck we are in at this point in time ? Isint he the same individuall who ( and correct me if i am wrong here ) having won the world cup, refrained from thanking his team or the australian crowd and instead went on about SKMT ?
    He too shall be surrounded by a coterie of nincumpoop advisors and the beurocracy and end up thinking of the ‘kursee’ instead of the nation.
    Having said that the biggest tragedy here is that the system has never been given the chance to self cleanse itself, before it could do that , some one or the other ( mostly the army ) took it upon themselves to save the country from disaster and in the process landed it into a bigger tragedy.
    My friends are telling me to move to Canada , i still have hope. If not for me , perhaps for my children !

  3. Sabahat says:
    May 17th, 2007 12:09 pm

    and no, i dont think calling someone’s comments idiotic warrants an equation with wasi zafar

    Sir, it has been pointed out to you and if anyone wants to scroll up they can read for themselves, you did not call my remarks idiotic (which would have been a personal attack too), but you used directly abusive language, in the light of that your mention of ‘The News’ carrying op-eds against Wasi Zafar is hilarious since I can really see no difference between his behaviour and yours.

    If you can distort statements that are in front of us for all to see why should anyone believe that you have any integrity in your writing?

  4. omar r. quraishi says:
    May 17th, 2007 9:38 am

    darwaish sahib — i think i know and understand the world around me without anyone presuming i dont - i am only 34 after all and i should think i am not aging — yet — i dont think i need to explain to you on this forum that i actually have publicised quite a few blogs in recent articles that i have written — what i am trying to say is that a lot of people here seem to have an over-exagerrated view of the importance of blogs — that is my view but they cant seem to digest it and launch personal attacks — which is a shame i think

    as for taking names, the news actually mentioned the names of the judges who met sharifuddin pirzada at islamabad club — or dont tell me you failed to read that story — also the names of the generals who were present there — incidentally, we were probably the only paper which allowed our columnists to write on the nirala accident affair — i never saw anything on it in dawn either

    ayaz amir btw is a columnist and not a full time staffer for the dawn — hence he is not a professional journalist per se, like ansar abbasi who is bureau chief of the news in islamabad — like i keep telling people, please get your facts right at least

    and since you keep on mentioning ayaz amir and ansar abbasi why dont you independently find out from them what kind of journalist i am — :) they will tell you how much or not i am like mujahid barelvi —

    thank you for your advice on press freedom as well darwaish sahib — actually i know what to do to protect press freedom — i suspect you however need to read the print media bit more — since you seem so concerned about what i need to do, i suggest you read the editorials of the news for some time and then come back and have a debate on what i need to do and not do

    also i hope you dont mind me asking what you do professionally darwaish sahib - given that you are advising me on what to do, its only fair that i be allowed to repay your compliment :)

    MQ — the media should be following that story as in reminding the govt to unearth the real culprits, which it does and to continue to ask questions, which it does as well — the job of unearthing is the govt’s, not the media’s —

    darwaish sahib, let’s not be disingenuous here — i thought on a blog one could easily use the word ‘idiot’ by qualifying its usage, without offending everyone? i m afraid i dont get why you should be so upset about that — i found an interactor’s posts idiotic and told her so — you cant seem to accept that? but you seem to have no problem with people making unsubstantiated insinuations about another interactor’s profession and his involvement/conduct in it — kindly dont give one or two examples where a newspaper could not print a name not because it was scared of censorship but for legal reasons –btw who do you think exposed wasi zafar by playing his taped remarks which he made on a VOA broadcast? was it a blog?

    you think if they were no newspapers around, people would be ok because they would get their information from the blogs? you too, darwaish sahib, seem to be living in a dream world — are you by any chance an expat as well — i have seen this tends to happen a lot with expat pakistanis

    also a lot of the blog sites, including this one, often draw on ideas from the english print media — so would you mind explaining that contradiction to your thesis to me now?

  5. Adnan Ahmad says:
    May 17th, 2007 9:19 am

    Aeysha Sajid, May be Imran Khan but I wonder how long would it take for the corrupt establishment structure (which has always been a constant denominator among all regimes) to neutralize him. From mine and many other comments you can tell that many ex supporters of musharraf have been thoroughly unhappy with him and with the recent disaster in karachi there seems to be no turning back. [Ironically the govt wanted karachi to be a nonevent and it became an even bigger event than lahore because of the lives lost]. Thinking out loud I do worry as to who would replace musharraf if he goes. A maulive brigade, a ppp with an inept leadership, pml n, are all a scary thought. But then looking at the people surrounding the general, Durr Fitte, Tariq Azeem and the finest gujrat has to offer, I feel sick too. Second tier of ministers serving because of their family connections are also useless by definition. In fact their 8-5 job is to protect and to work on their personal interests. This is our tragedy. As Ghalib said:

    kio aablaa paa iss vaadeey’ai purkhaar mein aa way

  6. Darwaish says:
    May 17th, 2007 9:05 am

    :).. AAJ tv hosted a debate a week or so after the attack on GEO and journalists from electronic and print media were discussing what to do to protect press freedom. Omar Sb, I think you should watch that program if you can get it on a CD or something. Mujahid Bralevi was one of the participants and you sound just like him though he would never words like ‘idiot’ during his public conversations. Some of the points you have made indicate that you are a bit unaware of the change that has occured outside The News office during last 4-5 years or so. Also you forgot to respond to the pressure stories told by Ansaar Abbasi and Ayaz Amir on various forums (I am sure they are professional journalists).

    Frankly most of the issues in this debate are relative. If we only focus on that very little segment of our society who read English news papers then blogging is quickly becoming a vital source of information for that particular segment. Anyone who knows how to use internet is spending more and more time reading blogs than English news papers and using blogs as their news source. Yes, News Paper’s importance will always be there to some extent but most readers in Pakistan, specially the young ones, who can read angerezi are quickly shifting towards blogs as an alternative source. One reason for this shift is the fact that Pakistani media, for whatever reasons, often provides vague and incomplete news on matters of public interest. Let me give you an example. Recently a federal minster’s nephew, who was drunk, got a little out of control did some badmaashi and danga fasaad in one of Lahore’s dance clubs. Most of the news papers gave vague and incomplete reports and did not mention who the hell was that minister but you can easily find the full story with names on several blogs. Similarly, our media reported about a meeting between Sharifuddin Pirzada and a few ‘important’ people just before CJ trial in SC. Thanks to blogs, you can actually report who met whom with names. For our tiny little angerezi samajhne wala segment of society, blogging is the next big thing for sure.

    Having said all that, if we look at the broader picture then blogs have long long loooooong way to go before becoming a useful news source for masses. Hopefully a time will come when an average rairhi wala or khokhe wala will have internet access just like mobile phones these days and there will be an Urdu version of ATP available for them :)

  7. MQ says:
    May 17th, 2007 8:26 am

    Omar Quraishi,

    I am digressing from the above debate but I wonder if any investigative journalist tried to find out who ordered the attack on Geo TV on March 13 that was watched live by the world. We know that 13-14 constables and an SI were suspended the same day, but who ordered the attack? Shouldn’t the media be following that story?

  8. ayesha sajid says:
    May 17th, 2007 6:39 am

    i am new to this thread infact to this site , a freind forwarded me this link and i have tried to skim through the thread to get an idea on what all is being said here.
    most pakistanis wellcomed musharaf , lets face it , even ardent democracy fans had had enough of the nawaz governments high handedness. before that we had wellcomed nawaz because we were all rather tired of mr. ten percent and his antics.
    we as a nation have a short term memory , we soon forget the torture we have all gone through with a certain regime and want it back because of lack of an alternative.
    and most importantly before we debate on who should stay or go and who should take over from this present regime , let us for once look at ourselves as individualls and as a society …
    as i see it ,
    a nation deserves the kind of leaders it gets.
    these leaders are from amongst us , they are a part of this delenquit, insensitive and numb society so why do we expect them to be gods angels on earth ?
    Let Musharraf go , lets assume he exits , who next ??
    Benazir ?
    Nawaz ?
    Imran khan ?
    Maulana fazal ur rehman ?
    Qazi sahib ?
    name one who is a lesser evil then Mush ?

Comment Pages: « 2321 20 19 18 17 [16] 15 14 13 12 111 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!