Custom Search

Pakistan’s Moment of Economic Opportunity

Posted on October 30, 2008
Filed Under >Yasser Latif Hamdani, Economy & Development, Politics
73 Comments
Total Views: 45457

Share

Yasser Latif Hamdani

Ours is a mismanaged country but one with potential to amply fulfill the needs of its citizenry. In so far as our economy goes, there is nothing that is wrong with it structurally.

Prima facie Pakistan’s current economic difficulties emerge out of high import bill and corresponding lack of investment.  The huge rise in the oil price internationally over the last few years along with an international crisis of agriculture production has affected this country just like it has affected all countries around the world.   For us, it also has to do with the unique geo-political role that we are forced to play without an effective negotiator on the top.

The recession in the West has given us breathing space. The oil price is now back down into the US$60 to a barrel range on the international market.  This is – as with all capitalist systems- an automatic correction of what was an unusually high increase in the costs of fueling the global economic system.


As it stands right now, Pakistan’s policy makers shall find a greater cushion than they expected.  If some of the price decline is passed on to the consumers in Pakistan, it will slow down the inflation rate considerably. The 30% to 50% food inflation rate over the last few weeks will go down to 12% to 16% in the coming months.  Even if it isn’t passed on, the correction vis a vis import bill is going to be substantial.  The policy makers thus have a menu of options available.

An important factor would be increase the tax base to include agricultural income.  Similarly, selective weekend taxes for petroleum products, as much as several hundred percent, will help bring both the burgeoning fuel demand and reduce pollution.  Similarly for power, instead of load shedding during the work week, it would be better to increase the tariff by significant amount on Sundays.  At the very least our policy makers should heavily tax imported products and luxury items for which there are local alternatives.

Pakistan’s economic growth will slow down from between 6 to 7 percent to between 4 to 5 percent.  To achieve a growth rate between 4 to 5 percent in times of a global recession is no mean achievement and it reaffirms the point made earlier.  Similarly, the State Bank’s decision to increase money supply by cutting in interest rates and cash reserve requirement indicates that the policy makers tend to agree that Pakistan’s current crisis is not demand pull (since the economy is slowing down) but is cost push due to external factors.  The immediate and possibly temporary reaction to State Bank’s decision was the appreciation of the Pakistani rupee which has generally been seen as welcome. Pakistani rupee will stabilize as the situation globally favors the developing world.

Ultimately the real solution for our economic woes, to use the hackneyed phrase, lies in increased foreign direct investment.   Since 2001, Pakistan had received only up to US$ 64 billion inflows, which is – no matter what people say- a pittance compared to our potential.  As an English-speaking nation of 165 million industrious and talented people, Pakistan presents an excellent opportunity for any foreign investor but for three major drawbacks.

One, we assume and project the same assumption on to foreign investors that that investments in Pakistan and India are mutually exclusive and since we view everything in comparison to our giant neighbor, we tend to underestimate ourselves increasingly so in the last decade and a half. Second, and more conclusively it is terrorism that has dulled Pakistan’s foreign investment in every sector including sport and tourism. In 2004-2005, Pakistan was an exciting tourist destination with Basant festivals, Polo matches and Cricket.  Today foreign sports teams are very rightfully apprehensive of visiting the country and almost every Western embassy has a travel advisory out. The Marriot bombing has all but completely brought not just international but domestic commercial activity to a halt.  And finally, it is the infrastructure.  For all of the last government’s purported achievements in the economic sphere, their inability to create power solutions for an annual demand for electricity growing at 7-10 percent.

How does one do it though is a tricky one. The first two are political issues. India’s existence as a bigger nation in our neighborhood need not be a threat to us. Indeed if Pakistan were to play its unique role as a neighbor of one emerging global economy like India, while courting Asia’s foremost power house China and manage to keep its ties with the US as its Major Non-Nato Ally at the same time, it is highly probable that under a democratic regime, Pakistan can manage to create a trillion dollar economy in two decades or less.

But this means a solutions or management of all existing disputes but most importantly the water crisis.  The most crucial issue however will be what role Pakistan plays in the Iran-US. Instead of waiting for the time where US gives Pakistan an option similar to the one it was given in 2001, Pakistan should play a pro-active role in bringing Iran and the US together by playing exactly the kind of role it played in the 1972 between China and the US. It would not be out of place to attempt once again to revive the long dead Regional Cooperation Development organization or the RCD between Turkey, Iran and Pakistan which would guarantee greater regional stability and economic options for Pakistan. Winning the war on terror is going to be essential but the war itself ought to be fought on several fronts one of which has to be economic.

The fall out of the war on terror has been economic and our allies should compensate us for our losses. But perhaps the most important thing any of our allies can help us with is in the power sector. Ideally the US should have boosted us by providing us the same kind of civil nuclear deal that it has offered India but much of that is impossible at present because of the history of nuclear proliferation and now that Dr. A Q Khan has rescinded on his earlier confession.  We still might get a nuclear deal from China. This is not all though.

Pakistan must make dams and make them quick. If Kalabagh is out of the question, then alternatives must be looked at and a quick decision taken on. Similarly the Iran-Pakistan pipeline is also essential and if India joins in, this pipeline might just be a pipeline of peace and prosperity in the region. All in all, if this democratic government was to play its cards right, it could raise up to another US$ 30-40 Billion in direct investment over the next 3 to 5 years and that would be more than enough to sustain and develop it.

The late US President Richard Nixon, one of the 20th century’s greatest statesmen, wrote in 1991 that Pakistan as a democracy, an important “modernist” Muslim state and a US ally was one of the most important countries in Asia, close relations with which were imperative for US’ own interests in Asia and the greater Islamic world. Unfortunately the policy makers in the US in the 1990s did not listen to him.  Now more than ever it is clear that our allies need us more than we need them – it is this essential premise on which we should deal with the world with our head held high.

Indeed if nations were judged by how hard they were hit and still managed to move on, Pakistan has given a good account of itself going from one crisis to another in quick succession.  But nation states, as with individuals, are judged not by how many crises it takes to bring them down but how far they travel on the road to progress and towards their stated aims and objectives. Without getting into ideological pretensions, the consensus that all major players in Pakistan’s politics have is that Pakistan ought to be: an economically viable state run by constitutional democratic means which was the original aspiration of the people of this country.

Our rulers have bungled up opportunities and have let the people down far too many times in the past. It is time for the current democratically elected government to take a long hard look at the situation and refrain from mock tough rhetoric that does no one any good.

Pakistan must seize the moment and take this as an opportunity to catch up.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

73 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 10 9 8 7 [6] 5 4 3 2 1 »

  1. meengla says:
    November 2nd, 2008 9:27 pm

    @Viqar,
    I am ‘finished’ for now. I will respond whenever I see it appropriate–perhaps in light of ‘new data’. But the fundamentals of my ‘position’ will remain a pragmatic democratic system pitted against the powerful military-led Establishment of Pakistan.
    Thank you,
    Meengla

  2. Viqar Minai says:
    November 2nd, 2008 9:20 pm

    @meengla,
    Are you finished? Or is there something more?

  3. meengla says:
    November 2nd, 2008 7:51 pm

    @Viqar,
    This is not so much a defense of YLH but more like to point out the shallowness of your’s and the arguments of multitude like you: In my last debate with you on this Blogspace, you didn’t want to give political-space (time) to the new democratic setup. You want it perfectly fine and you want it now. My argument in that topic (and in this one) is to let the political process take its time and let the electoral politics takes its ‘natural course’. But you…you wanted (wants?) Zardari to restore the judges NOW. You wanted (wants?) Zardari to give up the powers under 17th Amendment now?
    I am inclined to call you a ‘deluded idealist’ but that would be too much credit. There are no ideals in your thought: Just agitation against the govt. of the day, to appear ‘cool’. When you heaped scorn over the new democratic setup in Pakistan–refusing to give it time in a country–arguably, the most difficult country to govern–you presented no solutions except to expect ‘full restoration of judiciary’ and standing up to the Establishment.
    Well, the new govt. tried to reign in the ISI but got its winged burned pretty fast. Next step would be the jackboots marching prematurely down the power center of Pakistan. Perhaps THAT is what you want anyway?!
    Let the democratic setup have its time. The setup is TRYING very hard to follow the Charter of Democracy signed by Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif. So far it has not been too bad, despite the ‘usual’ chaos associated with a democratic dispensation.

  4. Viqar Minai says:
    November 2nd, 2008 6:56 pm

    Yasser miaN:

    I am not fixated on problems being “structural economic” issues alone in Pakistan (whatever the hell that may mean); rather with the entirey of the existential crisis in Pakistan.

    Now given the chip on your shoulder, what makes you think I would want to discuss “anything” with you? My apologies for the malicious attempts to derail your profound thoughts. Please carry on with building your castles in the air.

  5. meengla says:
    November 2nd, 2008 5:13 pm

    In these dark times–not just in Pakistan–YLH gives hope. Thank you, even if the hope -may- not fully founded in reality. By the way, I don’t agree with this 3-Comments per Post, least of all for the author of the Post.

    And there is nothing wrong in being a ‘non-expert’ but still commenting on a range of topics: People the world over do it; however ‘absurd’ sometimes their (and mine!) views sound there is, in my opinion, almost always an iota of ‘truth’ in the views.

    And now to my own comment: I think YLH is absolutely correct in emphasizing the role the new democratic govt. needs to play. This govt. is going to gets its priorities right before too long because, unlike the Musharraf-era, there is going to be accountability when the next elections come. So let the new setup get its feet wet. The new setup has already made the Baluch nationalists persuade into a ceasefire–no small achievement. The ruling coalition is working with the Army in NWFP and there are already some progress there either.
    Wait and see.

  6. Uzair says:
    November 2nd, 2008 5:02 pm

    Good, lightweight read. You make some good points, though some others are very simplistic. Unfortunately it’s difficult to take you seriously after you’ve declared Nixon one of the great statesmen of the 20th century :)

  7. Ibrahim says:
    November 2nd, 2008 2:52 pm

    Others have to worry about the 3-comments per post policy, but YLH is on a tear here. Seriously, Yasir, the fact that you’ve to write so much in the comments to defend yourself against most people means something is seriously flawed with your Alice and the Wonderland story.

    Yasir, if the money is not going to be raised by GoP killing some more people for cash, then tell me how will it be raised. I did ask you that. You think if Mush had not changed the policies, there would be any sort of foreign investment in Pak. during his time?

    And, how you managed to write a whole post about reviving the economy without mentioning the need for fundamental changes in the educational system is beyond me. All this points to a quick fix.

    What answer can I give since I’m not an economist and since my views have already been dismissed by YLH.

    So, yes, my “stock” answer might be not comprehensive because I’m not an economist, but you are har fun mawla, though…from Jinnah expert, to laywers and judiciary, to running social online “Muslim” networks, to squashing fundamentalism, to spreading secularism, to …

    However, here is a start: Start to demolish the interest-based system, implement Islamic financing, stop going after consumer-driven capatilism and stop taking huge amounts of debt to pay off other debts. Remove all the thieves and incompetent people sitting in every single GoP department. You think, for example, stopping this massive theft of electricity in the country is beyond the electrical companies? As long as Pakistan doesn’t want to suffer the pains of its historically inept economic policies and corruption and want a quick fix, the situation will not improve. Yes, not taking debt and doing away from interest-based system will hurt many initially, but it is what is needed.

  8. Jusathot says:
    November 2nd, 2008 1:46 pm

    It is NOT just our low domestic savings rate that isn’t a cyclical issue – many of our economic problems are by no means just cyclical. Our economic malaises to a great extend lies in our internal structural flaws. Alas, we haven’t learnt lessons from our past mistakes by not implementing structural changes and economic reforms.

    The folks who make our country’s economic policy are ‘maharajas’ and ‘maharanis’ and ‘court-scholars’ – who do not know about how the other Pakistan – the real Pakistan lives?

    Suchi gal suniway kewnkar, kachi haddan wich rachi

Comment Pages: « 10 9 8 7 [6] 5 4 3 2 1 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!