Pinglish, Urdish or Engdu?

Posted on August 17, 2006
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Humor, Pinglish
30 Comments
Total Views: 53041

Adil Najam

A couple of people have emailed to remind me that we have not had a post on Pinglish for a while. Maybe I got scared by sabizak’s reminder (here) that I should be more careful in my determination of what is or is not Pinglish. Must confess that I am still not sure what it is, even thought I offered a provisional definition of Pinglish (here); of course, this is very closely related to Hinglish. (More Pinglish posts here).

So, off I went in search of a better understanding of this thing I was calling Pinglish. What I found – hidden deep inside the crevasses of the Internet – was a delightful post on a forum called CyberMurid by someone going by the name bandali under the title ‘Pinglish, Urdish or Engdu.’ (Addition: Although I had originally found this material at the said website, we have since been informed that much of this material was part of an articel by Dr. Rauf Parikh in Dawn magazine, March 10, 2002.)

Here are the ‘techical essentials’:

A prominent feature of ‘Pinglish’ in the use of obsolete (in some cases even archaic) words and expressions. Local coinage is quite common. In some cases, this local coinage, though it may occasionally sound legitimate, would be incomprehensible or even hilarious to native ears. Sometimes, the local variety of the language sounds bookish (they ‘felicitate’, they don’t ‘congratulate’), too formal (‘do the needful’, for instance) or even ‘Un-English’. Many terms and phrases used in this part of the world are not part of the English language but have rather been ‘concocted’ and packed in a phrase-like expression. For example: pin-drop silence, cousin-brother, cutpiece and out of station (away from one’s home town). Grammatical liberties are quite interesting and pronunciation poles apart from what is known as RP (received pronunciation).

The writer goes on to give a hilarious list of examples. many of these are not ‘wrong,’ they are things that you will hear in Pakistan but those outside of our region may not understand them the way we do. Let me just share a few:

‘What is your good name’?
This may sound strange to the native ears since this is literal translation of ‘Ism-i-sharif’ in Urdu.

‘How is your good self?’
This also has a ring of Urdu. Perhaps ‘mizaj sharif’ translated.

Hotel:

It refers to an eatery as well as to any place meant for boarding and lodging. [ATP: Many of us still say ‘hotal meiN khana khana’ when we really mean restaurant].

Colony:
Forget colonialism and imperialism; in ‘Pinglish’ this refers to a large area comprising of residential blocks, for instance: Jinnah Colony, People’s Colony, Shah Faisal Colony, etc.

Cheater:
Used in colloquial Urdu (and local ‘English’, too) instead of ‘cheat’.

Bearer:
A waiter.

Affectee:
In desi English this means ‘someone affected,’ but it is not to be found in the dictionary (English dictionary, that is).

Cent percent:
Used instead of ‘a hundred per cent’ (‘per’ and ‘cent’ are put together).

Moot:
Used by some local newspapers instead of ‘meeting’.

Optical:
Used (especially by shops) in place of ‘eye glasses’.

Nullah:
Ravine; usually buses fall into ‘nullahs’ and ‘khuds’.

Dacoit:
A robber, perhaps from Urdu dakait.

Cutpiece:
A small, leftover piece of cloth; a local coinage. [ATP: See our ganderi discussion here and here].

Diggy:
The trunk of a car.

Black money:
Refers to money amassed through unfair means; another local usage, perhaps a literal translation of kala dhan

Toast:
A slice of bread whether toasted or not.

Kutcha:
Made of mud or clay, for example, a kutcha road, a kutcha house. Antonym is pucca.

Peon:
The dictionary says peon means a day-labourer; in India it meant a foot-soldier. But now, in Pakistan and India, it means ‘a messenger or office boy’.

Eve-teasing:
Sexual harassment.

Keep fast:
Instead of ‘fast’ (for roza); literal translation from Urdu.
Give exam:
Instead of ‘take exam’; literal translation from Urdu.

New, new things:
Literal translation from Urdu involving repetition of adjectives, such as ‘big, big cars’.

All of the original post if very well written and, importantly, is not trying to poke fingers at anyone:

This scribe is very much part of the mundane majority of Pakistanis that uses desi

At a more substantive level, bandali offers this useful and informative analysis:

Some linguists believe that a kind of ‘indigenization’ does occur when the speakers of other languages use a particular language and, according to them, when a language is used as a foreign language some ‘deviation’ may take place (because of the local milieu) and this ‘deviation’ should not be termed as a ‘mistake’. Rather, linguists like to refer to such versions as ‘regional variety’.

I do agree with this point of view, but in the case of desi English, they are not deviations or even mistakes; sometimes these are downright atrocities. I feel that if somebody wants to take revenge on the British for what they did to us during the British Raj, they should think of some other and better ways – for instance, ‘exporting’ some of our politicians to the UK for good (it will, in turn, benefit our country as well).

Some linguists, Dr Tariq Rehman, for instance, are of the view that Pakistani English is the new regional variety of the language and, therefore, should be viewed as such; i.e., something like South-Asian English or African English. This may be true, but in some instances, the ‘Urduization’ of English reaches such lengths that it sounds something like ‘Urdish’ or ‘Engdu’.

P.S. I have been unable to locate bandali and this writeup was originally posted on CyberMurid in March 2002; If someone knows who bandali is please convey to him (I assume it is ‘him’ from the name) that he has fans at ATP.

P.P.S. The photographs are from Jamsh; look at them carefully and enjoy. His photo collection is at Flickr.com and who blogs here. More Pinglish posts here.

P.P.P.S. Since having posted this, we have been informed that much of the material we had found on the CyberMurid website (now no longer functional) was part of an article by Dr. Rauf Parih in Dawn magazine (March 10, 2002).

30 responses to “Pinglish, Urdish or Engdu?”

  1. saleem awan says:

    I found you website very useful. keep your good work up and bring more goodies online.
    Can anyone help me find details “urdish” (Urdu language written in English alphabets)

  2. Dr Rauf Parekh says:

    This article first apperared in March 10 issue of Dawn (Magazine section) and was written by Dr Rauf Parekh. It’s a pity that it has been posted without proper credits and acknowledgements. A little courtesy and integrity won’t hurt us. Will it?

  3. Athar says:

    In my experience the richest sources of pinglish have always been teachers and those associated with the armed forces …

    Teachers:

    – The insistence that a hotel is where you eat and a restaurant is where you stay … because it is a “rest”-aurant

    – In the lab where everything must be ‘maiyured’ (measured)

    – (Chemistry) – Unit of energy – Jowel (Joule)

    – (On finding three boys smoking in the bathroom) “Get out of there both of you three ..”

    – (On people talking in class) “There will be no love making in my class …”

    – And of course the epitome is “Epitome” itself (rhyming with home)

    Armed Forces:
    – “Sir I tell you …”

    – “How can you can do this …”

    – Former PAF guy now in PIA when asked to get a shirt from abroad “What is your throat size?”

    – Same guy: “When in Rome do as the Romanians do”

    – Still same guy: “I will sort out all of these alligators, making these baseless allegations!”

    And finally my favorite phrase from a newspaper: “Police conducted a raid and arrested several miscreants involved in ‘merry-making-adultery’ …”

  4. Athar says:

    And lets not forget how so many people in Pakistan have a “complex” about something or the other.

  5. Zakir says:

    Actually its no longer ‘bearer’; correct pronounciation is ‘bairra’. Like it or not. Its our language.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*