Aqil Sajjad
It is being said by some people that the present economic crisis is a result of the uncertainty created by the lawyers’ movement. Some other people are saying that the judges issue’ is diverting attention from more pressing national issues. Such arguments are being given for ignoring the judges’ issue so that the economy can be put back on track. Below, I will try to address these arguments.
A closer scrutiny of the economy shows that the present economic crisis has nothing to do with the lawyers’ movement that started on March 9.
Load shedding due to power shortage started in 2006 and any well informed person knew that it was only going to get worse since the Musharraf government had made no serious attempt to address the problem. For example, we can check this news report from 2006: Pakistan needs to tackle energy crisis or this one from Jan 9, 2007: Pakistan’s Energy Crisis to Worsen in Next Two Years
Similarly, the pressure on the foreign reserves and the rupee was also very much expected due to the record trade deficits. This again, had nothing to do with the lawyers struggle, as we can see from this report dated Jan 2007: Pakistan Trade Deficit Widens as Imports Rise and this one from March 9, 2007 (the day Musharraf sacked the CJ): Trade gap widens to record $8.89bn
Likewise, many analysts were saying well before March 9, 2007 that the economic growth momentum was not sustainable. For example, check the following piece dated May 1, 2006 from the daily times: Is GDP growth sustainable?
In light of the above, it should be clear that our present economic crisis is a result of gross mismanagement by the Musharraf govt, and it could be clearly seen coming well before March 9, even when Musharraf was comfortably entrenched in power. The lawyers’ movement and the related political uncertainty is definitely not an important contributing factor in this crisis.
Is the judges’ issue delaying a resolution to the economic crisis? Should the civil society give up its demand for the restoration of the judiciary? Again, I believe the answer is clearly in the negative for the following reasons:
1. The PPP can simply restore the deposed judges while removing those who have taken oath under the Nov 3 PCO and then we would not have this political uncertainty. The blame for any political uncertainty therefore lies on the shoulders of the Musharraf-Zardari-Rehman trio and their foreign backers.
2. The judges’ issue does not stop the government from working on the other issues.
3. A solid institutional basis is needed to put the country on a sustainable path of progress. We keep on having these political crises because we do not have sound institutions. Ignoring the judges’ issue in the name of the economy will therefore only bring temporary relief if at all. But if the judiciary does get restored, then we might have a better institution which should help the country in the long-run.
4. An independent and credible judiciary is also needed to keep the excesses of the government under check. We all know how large scale corruption and nepotism seriously damages the economy. In the steel mills case alone, the government was giving away billions of rupees to the buyer by selling this national asset well below its value. The Supreme Court headed by honourable Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry prevented this big loss to the nation by stopping the loot sail. It would therefore be totally ridiculous to argue that the civil society’s emphasis on the restoration of the judiciary is a hurdle in improving our economy. Those who care about eliminating corruption so that our resources can be directed towards the development of Pakistan and the well-being of the people must come out strongly on the side of the legitimate judiciary. They should not side with those who are only trying to protect their power and loot through the NRO.
5. Our governments are usually unresponsive to the needs and demands of the people. This is because they face very limited pressure from the electorate and the civil society. Zardari and co are also thinking that they can get away without restoring the judges and the people will not be able to do anything about it.
If the civil society backs down on this issue for any reason, it will only make people like Musharraf and Zardari feel bolder. On the other hand, if the civil society wins this battle, it might allow the people of Pakistan to assert themselves more strongly on other issues too. Whether it’s food security, inflation, law and order, education, healthcare, or any other such issue, our leaders will feel that they can not totally ignore the wishes of the people and get away with it. For this reason, even if one is not sure whether the judges’ issue ought to be the no 1 priority, one should put one’s full weight behind it. Such a national consensus on an issue provides a rare opportunity for establishing the power of the people which might not come again in our entire life time. We must not lose such a golden opportunity by getting into petty squabbles over whether issue x is more urgent than issue y.
Thiis article was Initially published on the emergency times and a slightly different version by the daily News as a letter.
@Aqil Sajjad,
your title
” Is the judg’s issue Impeding Progress
on the Economy ” ?
Question: ( sorry, a long one)
Is the ensemble of Politics, involved in :-
Cheating, corruption, lying, Hoarding, price-hike,
-20%, smuggling out the food reserves,
Bhattas from small & big Industries,
black-mailing in Finance,
Education Minister discovering 7000 schools shut ?
Poverty in general, health-care-I-don’t-care !
Foreign Mafia involved in the major National resources,
Low Standard of Education
Social justice and equality down the drain, etc etc
are not impeding Progress on the Economy ??
Ik mua’ama hon, samajhnay ka, ne samajhanay ka !!!
Can somebody explain to me what the esteemed and deposed Chief Justice is like? There is a lot of hoo-haa about how important his reinstatement is for the country. But no one has mentioned his achievements. Personally, I do not see any exceptional qualities in the guy to leave the country in limbo for his sake. Heck for all I know, the guy does not seem important enough. Mr. E. Ahsan is backing the wrong horse. The fight should not be for reinstatement of the a judge, but for the reinstatement of the original constitution. The presidential powers should be curbed by annuling the ammendments and ensure that the future judiciary is selected wisely. Justice Chaudhary has been guilty of accepting the same dictator who is now his enemy.
What are the achievements of Justice Chaudhary? He has had a long career. Please tell me what he has done prior to his short stint of challenging the goverment on illegal detentions?
The argument that the “judges issue” has impacted the country’s economic progress makes sense if one believes that successive governments take different economic policies. As of now, there is no evidence of that.
@Bus kar do Bus: ok suggest me a way to improve our society. instead of having pity on others go out and do what ever you think can fix the issue.
Ask the man on the street and he will say that Zardari and Nawaz and the rest of their ‘team’ have been tried and tested and proved themselves corrupt and incompetent time and again. The two ingredients for good governance are competence and sincerity, which none of them have. All they are capable of is seducing the imagination of the public with rhetoric and with promises ‘without a deadline’.