Adil Najam
First, let me by absolutely upfront and clear. I do not know if Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gillani is going to be replaced. That is the whole point, I do not know. But, I would very much like to know. Hence, the question mark at the end.
So, please, all rumor-mill mongers, lets not make this into anything more than it is. The rumors I am hearing are exactly the same one that you are hearing. What worries me is that I am hearing them more and more. If they are just rumors, what is the significance of their spreading so fast and furious now? And if they turn out to be more than just rumors, what would that mean for Pakistan?
There is something, of course, in the timing of all of this.
The Prime Minister’s domestic performance has left a trail of embarrassments. The problems of high energy and food prices cannot be laid on his door, but have not helped. A fiasco-ridden first television address to the nation may end hurting PTV’s new management but it has hurt the Prime Minister even more.
The Prime Minister’s international sojourns have been no less spectacular, and possibly more worrisome. An much-touted but uninspiring US trip ended with the US accusing Pakistani ISI to have had a hand in a horrible Kabul bombing on the Indian Embassy. A possibly more important meeting with the Indian Prime Minister at the SAARC summit was preceeded with a statement from India that Pakistan-India relations are now (because of the same bombing) at a recent low.
Having met and heard him speak recently, I can say that one-to-one he comes across as a man full of Southern-Punjab charm and affection, but he really is not someone known for Obama-like oratory. One senses, however, that it is not a lack of oratory skills that he is being grilled for by his critics.
Noises in the air have begun to grow. Writing in The News before the Prime Minister’s US trip, senior journalist Shaheen Sehbai suggested:
For the PPP, the only option left is for Zardari to come back to Pakistan, if he can get over his family problems quickly. He must head for the PM House, get himself elected and assume the charge as PM because Yousuf Raza Gilani cannot deliver anything nor can he be blamed for not doing so.
Upon his return from the trip, Mr. Sehbai’s assessment was even harsher: “the man who represented democracy in Pakistan fell short on many scores.”
Washington was not ready for such a visit and whoever forced it on Gilani did a great disservice to the man, to the party he represents and to Pakistan’s infant democracy. At a time of great internal political, administrative, security, economic and social turmoil, packing him off to Washington as a showpiece, so early in office, could at best be described as a deep conspiracy of sorts.
The prime minister was not ready for the visit as he has yet to learn the basics of the governance, starting with speaking before the TV prompter to the nation, to determining how to handle big or small issues, how to consolidate power and how to demonstrate it. He is only a beginner.
The very independent, but generally sympathetic to PPP, columnist Khalid Hassan’s comments in the Daily Times were even more scathing:
With the uncertainty prevailing at home, the coalition, a partnership in name only, the judges issue still hanging in the air and with the NWFP and adjacent areas slipping out of state control, Gilani should have stayed home and only come when things had settled down. No one in Washington has any illusions about Pakistan, nor people here are unaware of where power lies. It is known that the prime minister exercises little authority and all decisions are taken by others.
There are, of course, others – including in a Daily Times editorial that seemed to be rebutting a column in its own pages – who think that the criticism of the Prime Minister’s visit to the US is overblown. Indeed, it may well be.
What is clear, however, is that it is not just the USA visit, or just the PTV speech fiasco, or just any other single thing. It is all these things and more that are keeping people from having faith in the leadership of Syed Yousuf Raza Gillani.
The real charge, it seems, is that he really is not in-charge and may be asserting even less leadership than he is being allowed to. As one commenter in our recent ATP Poll on this subject suggested: “Yousuf Reza Gillani is to Asif Ali Zardari what Fazal Elahi Chaudhry was to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.” That itself may be a bum rap, but as other readers pointed out, what was most striking – disturbingly so – in the results of the poll was that after 7 days of polling and 411 votes case, not a single reader voted for Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gillani.
In all the polls that we have conducted at ATP, this has to be teh single most surprising and striking result. What is surprising and striking is not that people do not think that the Prime Minister is truly in-charge of the country. That is not news. But what is striking and surprising is that not even a single person voted in this poll for him.
Of course, our Polls are not a scientific sample. But, although this sample represents all the biases of the select group that visits this blog, it is nonetheless a political diverse community (just read the comments on any political post) and there is nearly never a unanimity on anything. To see such unanimity on Syed Yousuf Raza Gillani is, therefore, noteworthy. One would have expected that maybe he would get a few sympathy votes, or votes from a few die-hard PPP supporters, or from those who keep leaving messages (sometimes asking for jobs) on our earlier post on him. But, no, not a single vote was recorded for him! (Even the proposition, in an earlier poll, that Gen. Musharraf would not be able to get himself elected President got 3 percent of the vote!).
For those who wish to see a stable working democracy evolve in Pakistan the image of a Prime Minister who no one thinks has any power is sad and disturbing. There is clearly something that is leading to more and more people asking: “Is Yousuf Raza Gillani on his way out?” But why is the chorus around this question growing now?
Is it because there are dark and sinister forces who are purposefully creating such an impression? Is it because he really was a bad choice and therefore should be replaced? Is it because we as a people are too impatient and have not really given him a chance to settle into the job? Is it because PPP is now ready for an internal change and all of this is in preparation for that? Or is it because (as 39 percent of our Poll respondents felt) no one is really in-charge of Pakistan and this is just a manifestation of the country spiraling further into chaos?
The sad fact is that in Pakistan today, any and all of the above is possible.

























































Can we please have Mr. Mushrraf back……before all hell breaks loose…
I didn’t know about your poll. Count my lone vote for Gilani. He’s not the most articulate. But don’t compare him with Obama’s speeches. Obama almost always reads from a teleprompter – can’t understand why he has to – a professor shouldn’t have to read his speeches, so I, for one, think that he is not all that articulate. About the US trip, I don’t think Gilani was that bad. He was speaking somone else’s tongue and wasn’t prepared by the advisers. I think way too many Pakistanis have learned the masters’ tongue through the bad habit of mixing it with Urdu to the point that when someone speaks so-so English, it comes across as really bad. As to which forces are acting behind the scenes to spread these rumours, can’t say, but could it have to do with Gilani having boldly talked Pakistan’s “sovereign-i-ty” :) in the face of America in a televised interview regarding the predator drone attack? (not an obedient servant) Call me crazy, but one solution is to get Nawaz Sharif (leadership experience) or Itizaz Ahsan (spine), or even Imran Khan (articulate and much spine, even as president) to lead the nation IF and only IF Gilani has to leave. This in response to the poster who wants someone who’s more sure of oneself like Ahmadinejad. Zardari doesn’t make any sense to me. If being a previous leader’s relative has to be the main credential to succeed, then good luck to Pakistan’s democracy. Also, could someone please evict that foreign/CIA agent from the presidential palace. BTW, what’s the deal with Aafia Siddiqui (?), the woman scientist still in custody? – what do they mean by “found alive” – wasn’t she held all along? Seems like Umreeka is going after Pakistan on all-fours. I know Pakistanis have been forced or lulled into subservience and oblivion by Uncle Sam and they will always love and trust Umreeka, no matter how much anger or jest he throws at Pakistan. Remember the thing the neocons like Rumsfeld said about Iraqis — that when we bomb them they’ll respond by bringing us flowers — turned out to be false and stupid in the case of Iraq, but If (Na’oozubillah) Pakistan is attacked by Umreeka (likely in the near future), I wouldn’t be much surprised by such a claim by the McCain or Obama administration. ….. Please don’t delete this awkward looking message – my return key is stuck – and also this is the only yes vote :) .
This is a balanced article. You are right that some of the criticism is overblown. Also some of this is propaganda against him. But I think the statements from Shaheen Sehbai who is very close to Zardari show that Zardari himself is going to kick out Gillani and maybe take the PM position himself now.
If Gillani is not even using the extent of power that he is ‘allowed’ to use then it has to be mere INCOMPETENCE. A man of vision (even a man of sound political ambition) would seize the chance and go all out to do things that would benefit the country and hold him in good stead in future. Would PPP (read Zardari) have been able to fire/replace him for ‘doing things right’!?!?!?! I think not.
One must not be afraid of getting replaced. Junejo asserted his power and was replaced by Zia for doing that. In th end he earned respect for all.
Oratory aside, Prime Minister Gilani seemed to be very puerile and robotic in his repetitive, substance-free, responses delivered in shaky English (Pinglish?) to the American audience. He is definitely not ready for prime-time and I doubt if he’ll ever be. He reminded me of Zafarullah Khan Jamali and his visit to the White House. Gilani is a far cry from the urbane and sophisticated Shaukat Aziz or charismatic , celebrity-like Benazir Bhutto. At a difficult time like this, Pakistan needs a really inspiring leader and an effective salesperson to sell the Americans and the world on why Pakistan deserves to be considered a good friend, a moderate, progressive nation, and a reliable partner for world peace. I think the PM’s visit here was a wasted opportunity.
I felt more pity and embarrassment than pride in watching Mr. Gilani’s mediocre performance.