This post is based on an imaginary scenario.
Imagine Pakistan was a very different place. Imagine that it had politicians (not all, just a few, maybe one or two in government and one or two in opposition) who actually cared for Pakistan and made decisions based on what would be good for the country instead of just useful to their own hold on power.
I have probably already lost half of you, but let me keep going anyhow.
Imagine, what might happen in such a Pakistan in response to the brutal murder of Salman Taseer by the evil Malik Mumtaz Hussain Qadri?
What might the government do if it were really and truly serious about giving justice to Salman Taseer and rolling back the intolerance and extremism that gunned him down?
Let me suggest five things that would happen if Pakistan was, indeed, a functional state and society.
Instead of the emotional slogans, false tears, and petty political point-scoring that we are now seeing, here are a few things that might have happened if Pakistan was the place we all want it to be, but is not (starting from the easiest and moving to the most important):
- The immediate culprit – Malik Mumtaz Hussain Qadri – would be immediately and swiftly (that is critical) tried in a court of law and given the full punishment under the law. Justice which is transparent, fair, and speedy should be done, and seen to be done.
- All opportunities to turn the murderer into a public hero would be denied to him and his ‘fans.’ This means, no access to media, no opportunities to be garlanded, no occasions to shout slogans to TV cameras, etc. There are lots of simple means to do so and the media would be banned – for national sanity reasons – from reporting directly on his, running footage of him, or in any way projecting him. The purpose would be not to restrict information, but to resist misinformation on a pending case.
- Immediate investigation would be undertaken against all who had instigated violence and murder, issued fatwas, or in any ways created the inducement or provided encouragement to commit violence against Salman Taseer or others in relation to the blasphemy issue. This would certainly include, at a minimum, those evil jokers who were publicly offering money for murder but would also include an immediate and swift investigation into those on the media who had contributed to instigation and hysteria and inflamed emotions with violent rhetoric and also those political or public figures (including so-called ‘ulemas‘) who may have directly instigated violence in the name of this issue at any public rally. These investigations would swiftly lead to arrests, trials, and full punishment under incitement to violence laws.
- Anyone justifying murder, glorifying the murderer, or creating public incitement on this issue in the aftermath of the murder would be swiftly arrested, tried and given full punishment under the law. This could require large number of arrests to crush illegal rallies, etc., and the government would be ready to take that principled stand. This would also include full legal action against any media person using the media to justify the breaking of the law or the act of murder (for example, by arguing – directly or indirectly – that the murder of Salman Taseer was justified).
- The government would immediately move to repeal, or at least review the Blasphemy law itself and swiftly bring needed changes to it so that its spirit is not misused or made subject to vigilantism. This would be the least that could be done to honor the memory of Salman Taseer.
None of these would be easy to do, even in a saner Pakistan. But ‘difficult’ is never an excuse not to do what is ultimately ‘right.’
I do not really expect our current political leaders to do the right thing, on this issue or any other; or to give justice to Salman Taseer, or me. But at least I can try to push the conversation away from the inanities I hear on the TV and read in newspapers and towards a sense of what the ‘right’ thing to do would be, even if in an imaginary Pakistan.
Adnan says …
“”Jesus is holy figure for Muslims too, as far as your question is concerned. Unlike other religions Islam automatically cover every other religion and its rights.””
OH MY GOD !! It is this statement of Adnan that really betrays the level of deception and delusion Muslim fanatics indulge in – they believe their own lies and say it with such confidence !!
Jesus is Son of God for Christians… not a ‘holy figure’. Anyone who doesn’t believe that Jesus is GOD is not certainly not in anyway claim to adhere to their philosophy.
Christians believe Jesus was nailed to the cross and was reincarnated. Do Muslims also believe this ? As far as I know – Muslims believe
And as for other religions and their prophets begin covered by Islam… I can only see followers of non-Abrahamic religions laugh at that statement.
From what I understand about non-abrahamic religions like Buddhism/ Taoism/Hinduism say ‘ All paths to God are legitimate’. That is why they rarely seek to convert others to their way because all ways are correct in eyes of God. ( I am not saying they dont have HUGE faults but at least on this point they are more accepting of other philosophies)
Islam and Christianity say – My way is the only way and if you don’t agree with me you will go to hell ( and oh yeah we’ll tax u too and harass you in anyway to force to change your religion!). That is why Muslims and Christians are always looking to convert people because they believe that others faiths are wrong. !
If Islam believed in all prophets/philosophies are acceptable it wouldn’t have a horrible word like ‘Kafir’ to identify non-muslims.
All I can say to Adnan is, drinking and commenting don’t mix well.
@Nusrat
You did not understand my post. Pakistanis will indeed say yes to “Shariat” in surveys and click “I love Islam” on facebook because they are conditioned to do so, having grown up in a religious society.
This does not equal Pakistanis putting their mind, money or effort into a Shariat-type system, because majority of Pakistanis don’t know what that really means, and are not interested in it either. Same goes for many other Islamically-linked topics.
aamir al – “A religious society like Pakistan will automatically say “Yes” to anything that is connected to Islam.”
your contention is belied when you look at turkey, malaysia or indonesia, which are all muslim countries, but i doubt very much that they would acquiesce to the hypothetical query of allowing sharia to trump their respective constitution. don’t you think?
these surveys, while not perfect, should give pakistanis pause, given their large percentage.
if educated people continue denying the monster living in their home, then the monster will only get bigger and meaner.
Nusrat,
Jesus is holy figure for Muslims too, as far as your question is concerned. Unlike other religions Islam automatically cover every other religion and its rights.
The content of Blasphemy Law was present by Muslims to avoid unpleasant incidents. Other religions like Hinduism ,Bible religions like Christianity/Judaism also has content of Blasphemy law in their holy book and since it was about their holy figures, they also did not mention prophets/holy figures of other religion. Therefore, your question does not make any sense.
@SM: I think you mean Hazrat Umar Bin Khattab(RA) rather than Umar Bin Abdul Aziz(Rehmatullah Alhye)
A religious society like Pakistan will automatically say “Yes” to anything that is connected to Islam. So a Herald survey about Sharia in Pakistan will have same result as Pakistanis who routinely “Like” stuff on Facebook such as “I like Islam” and “I love Pakistan” etc. These same folk in Herald survey or Facebook have little knowledge of the underlying topic.
This is an open and shut case where Salman Taseer was murdered for democratically opposing an unjust man-made law. I hope his killer receives 25 years solitary confinement, followed by execution.