Higher Education in Pakistan: Future Tense

Posted on March 29, 2011
Filed Under >Muhammad Hamid Zaman, Economy & Development, Education
Total Views: 80418

Muhammad Hamid Zaman

Higher Education Commission Pakistan HECThe Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan may soon be dissolved and the authority devolved to the provinces. This move does not bode well for the future of higher education in Pakistan and should be cause for serious concern.

According to The News (March 25):

Implementation Commission has approved the devolution of HEC despite the fact that it exists in the Federal Legislative List (FLL) while under 18th amendment only concurrent list is supposed to be devolved. It has been learnt reliably that the Implementation Commission in its last meeting reviewed the HEC law for almost five hours after which they had decided to devolve it without taking HEC into confidence.

Not only do the provinces have little or no capacity or infrastructure, the loss of autonomy will also be a major setback for implementing and standardizing higher education. HEC not only serves the purpose of developing, supporting and promoting higher education, it is also the main source of research support in the country. The move will mean that provinces, without any existing infrastructure or capacity, will now be in charge of higher education as well as nearly all research funding in the country.

The move, while likely to go ahead, has been widely opposed – and rightly -by academics, university administrators and researchers across the country. According to Express Tribune (March 27):

Vice chancellors (VC) of public universities made a strong but futile attempt to push for the Higher Education Commission (HEC) to retain its current role. VCs from more than 36 public sector universities along with HEC Chairperson Dr Javed Laghari and Executive Director Dr Sohail Naqvi met with the Commission for Implementation of the 18th Amendment on Saturday.

Dr Laghari, in his presentation to the committee, stated that the 18th Amendment fully supported the current powers and functions of the HEC. He said the provinces and universities had a strong and forceful voice in the HEC. “They are full participants and decision makers in the development and implementation of all plans for the promotion of higher education in the country. Therefore [there is no need to devolve the HEC],” he argued.
The vice chancellors unanimously agreed that the HEC had done a great job in the past eight years and its existence in its present shape would only ensure the maintainance of high standards of education in the country. They said the commission must continue to perform all its functions in the same manner as it has been doing to date.

The VCs observed that transferring the higher education system to the provinces would complicate education policies and implementation processes. Smaller provinces would be affected due to their lack of capacity to handle matters pertaining to higher education.

However, implementation commission chairperson Senator Raza Rabbani said HEC has no role in the future except setting standards and regulation of higher education, according to the commission’s interpretation of the 18th Amendment.

While opinions are divided on the successes of HEC over the last eight years, there is little debate on whether or not we need a strong institution to promote and strengthen our higher education and research. Developed and developing countries, across the globe have institutions with a similar mandate and these institutions are almost always centralized with the federal government. Provinces or states have smaller scale institutions that compliment, but never replace the national one.

HEC has not been without its critics. It is important that we continue to discuss and debate the successes and criticize failures of HEC, as this is in the very spirit of nation building. Yet, we should do this while keeping in mind the best interest of quality research and highest standards of education. In a society that is already suffering from an economic and infrastructure meltdown, dissolving what already exists, and creating replicate institutions from scratch, seems far from practical or prudent for nation building.

Prof. Zaman is Assistant Professor at Boston University.

23 responses to “Higher Education in Pakistan: Future Tense”

  1. Adil says:

    What else could be expected from these visionless leaders. I dream about my country ans this is my dream education reforms:
    http://ihaveadream-pakistan.blogspot.com/2011/02/e ducation-reforms.html
    All the best to my beautiful homeland.


  2. Tonya says:

    The HEC was not perfect but it was better than everything else. If they did not like it they shoudl be improved it, not destroyed it!

  3. Khawar Nehal says:

    Great, now that it is over, can we come together and make something better.
    All those interested please email me your ideas privately.


    Khawar Nehal

  4. Pakistan Foundation says:

    HEC is not only white elephant rather a big elephant.

    It has more than 28 director Generals etc.

    They have no records even today to verify the
    degrees but are making money by stamping the
    degrees and making the process of attestation
    lengthy and complicated.

    Entry test which they introduced ( a system over
    system ) and their own presence over the universities
    must be abolished forthwith and staff transferred for
    some productive jobs.

    Although , PPP government is abolishing HEC for
    political reasons as they don’t know about the knitty
    gritty which this white elephant has been doing.

    All concerned , universities should attest their degrees
    because they have the relevant records whereas HEC
    was just making money and bothering students / graduates.

    These angles sitting in HEC should be sent to different
    universities in government pay scales instead of awarding
    them special packages due to their political links with
    Musharraf / Atta ur Rehman ( Atta ur Rehman himself is
    not an educationist – Musharraf just boosted him ).

    Pakistan Foundation

    Note : We are not PPP supporters / opponents. Pro pakistan only.

  5. Sehar Tauqeer says:

    @ Aslam

    Again no one is saying all is colourful in the spectrum of HE sector of Pakistan , yes , it was a new experience and experiment first time in Pak to give such a massive funding to HE sector and a new experiment always have loopholes with it just like admiring present form of British democracy is different while looking it in 1200 AD ! Before 2002 , there was no one in Top 1000 list , the compilation list is of Top 300 and certainly 281 and 274 would be at the bottom of the list and still with average 2.5% growth in last 3 years,devasting floods, less than 1.4% on education budget and merely 0.4% on HE, one of the lowest in the world , where PSDP for FY 2010-2011 slashed from Rs.450 bn to 150 bn , 73 public sector universities receiving less than Rs 12 bn annually and government is desperately looking towards JICA , WB, ADB, Kerry Luger Bill to bridge the gap fundings to HEC . In the midst of all these , being in top list of 300 is still a Success !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.