An interesting news item crossed my attention this past week. It was reported (in The Nation and many other places) that sermons delivered in Pakistani mosques before the Friday prayers will now be recorded by police. Under the Loudspeaker act, the government has mobilized the Police forces to clamp down on mosques where Friday sermons are being used to incite hatred against other sects, religions, or especially against the government. According to an AKI/Dawn report:
A source in a law-enforcement agency told the Pakistani daily Dawn that police officials would be deployed in mosques across the country to film the Friday sermons. The move was aimed at ensuring that hate speeches were not delivered from the pulpit. Pakistan’s provincial home secretaries and senior officials of the country’s law-enforcement agencies attended a meeting on Saturday to chalk out a strategy to keep close tabs on the Friday sermons -sometimes employed to foment sectarian unrest.
The source said station house officers would give a report on the recorded sermons and speeches to district police officers on a weekly basis. He added police action could be initiated against those who offend people’s religious beliefs.
This is a big deal in Pakistan, and if serious steps are indeed being taken to ‘monitor’ or ‘control’ the messages being relayed from mosque loudspeakers, I believe ramifications can be felt further down the road. The loudspeakers are really the best way for the mosque administration to reach a large audience, and I am sure they will protest if punitive actions are taken against Imams whose lectures are considered threatening.
Friday prayers hold a special place in the culture and tradition of most Muslim countries, including Pakistan. While many muslims pray 5 times a day, it is indeed Friday when mosques are filled up, and when communities come together in a prayer exercise that almost carries a ritualistic fervor to it, in addition to the special status it holds within the religion Islam.
The Friday sermons from the pulpit have also held a special status in South Asia. They were not just lectures that clarified religious teachings, but were also used to declare community consensus on issues that were linked to religion and religio-politics. For example, my dad tells me how some sermons in the Indian town of Kanpur were essential in calming Hindu-Muslim riots in the pre-partition India. I also remember growing up and learning so much about the various aspects of Muslim life, such as the histories of Islamic rule at various times and the personalities associated with them, the rights of women in marriage, arrangements for funerals, etc etc through friday sermons.
With the advent of loud speakers, however, these sermons started reaching out to audiences beyond those who came to the mosque voluntarily, and became a permanent presence in every household on Friday (whether you liked it or not). Sermons today, at least in many parts of Karachi, start early in the day and provoke a certain sense of guilt if one was going to miss the prayers, and invoke a little motivation in the listeners to go and attend. Despite the frequent annoyance of loud religious messages being thrust onto an involunatry audience for an entire half day, at least the messages conveyed in the past via the content of the sermons were often positive or thought provoking.
However, that has not always been the case. Every now and then, the pulpit continues to be abused, and sermons littered with misleading political messages, and even those inciting communal disharmony, hatred and violence, have been delivered to an otherwise eager and ‘available’ audience. It was just a few years ago, under Benazir’s last stint in office, that a friday sermon at my local mosque was used to declare that Islam did not allow a woman to be the head of state. Similarly, soon after 9/11, I heard a sermon asking God to severely punish all those Muslim leaders who were conspiring with the ‘Kafirs’ to throw bombs at muslims in Afghanistan. Last year when sectarian violence was erupting in the city, a Friday sermon declared a prominent sect in Islam to be equivalent to another sect which had already been declared non-muslims by the state of Pakistan. On my last visit to Pakistan, I heard a sermon declaring that jihad-fi-sabeel-lillah in Kashmir, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine was a sure way to earn a permanent place in the heavens.
And the list goes on…There are many who complain about the use of loudspeakers by mosques, but I believe the content of the sermons is probably a more important issue to deal with. So I am indeed interested in seeing further what the government now intends to do to monitor the friday sermons, and limit their use for (hopefully) useful education and information dissemination. But there is a wider question that we must ask ourselves. Should the state have any authority over the content delivered in mosque sermons (I am told Saudi Arabia may already have tight controls over their Friday sermons)? Would such monitoring and control strategy constitute a limit on the freedom of speech for the mosque Imams? Or would it really all be easy if simply the loudspeakers were removed from the mosques?
A large audience sitting fully engaged for an extended period of time can be an ideal way to engage society in discourse on important matters, such as those related to religion and community life. But how to get it done without getting it hijacked by one or more parties, including the government?
A very pertinent post Bilal. With the spread of the puritanical version of Islam it is more and more important the sermons are monitored. The real problem has already been pointed out by Saadia. Maybe it is time that we started provided standardised training to our imams as is done by Jewish and certain Christian communities.
Forgive me if I am blunt but I think there is no need to have so many masjids in single street of Pakistan. The govt. should make very strict laws to open a masjid. Like an Imam has to be fully qualified of Islamic studies. As More masjids means more firqa bazi and ultimately fitna bazi as well. Mostly Pakistanis think that a person who is Hafiz ul Koran is a real scholar thats why that guy sits on Imam’s seat and gives openly many fatwas. But taking the case of many Pakistani masjids I must say that learing Koran by heart does not mean that one really knows the real message of Koran and what is authentic Hadith and how to go for Ijtihad and Qiyas.
I appreciate the govt.’s step to control Fitna but they also need to control the corruption of our police dept. otherwise it wont work well.
I believe this step is very much needed in today’s society where the people at the loudspeaker have their own agenda’s to promote, rather than Islam. A couple of imam’s i love to listen to for friday sermons take up one religious issue each week, and backs it up with facts and stories. Now that is what i believe the sermons are there for.
A very good step! and i say down with all the ‘mullahs’ who promote hatred!~
Good post Bilal. I agree with you on the abuse of these sermons. In the case of rural areas, instead of every now and then I would say almost regularly the loudspeakers are abused. Almost 11 years ago there was a story outside Gujranwala (I think) where a “learned” imam settled his score with a man by calling him blasphemous on loudspeaker and then of course an angry mob killed him in daylight. There have been numerous such instances after that.
On a much lighter note, recently I read in a US urdu daily that a mozun in punjab was selling vegetables on the loudspeaker right after the azaan.. they quoted something like.. “taazaa bhindiaan abhi abhi aayee hain.. forun aa kurr khareed lein..” I am not sure whether to laugh or cry on this..
I suppose it’s a slippery slope to go down – right now it may be intended to prevent intolerance of other religions or sects, but tommorow when (if) the discussions at these Friday prayers treads towards poltically senstive issues or issues that might not cast the government in good light, well, what do we do then? Will this be another step towards policing states like China/Singapore (not to suggest that we have any moral high ground on then) where the contents of your discussions have to be upheld to the government’s standard of social discourse.
But then again maybe I haven’t heard the spew coming out of the ever growing number of mosques (as a aside: there used to be 3 mosques within a few block where I used to live in Islamabad – and each mosque iman would try to out yell the other guy! it was hilarious) Maybe it’s a good thing – since our englightened religious “leaders” wish to thrust themeselves in every part of society, a little policing should neutralize things out (not really…)