Pakistan of 2007: What Would Have Mr. Jinnah Wanted?

Posted on September 11, 2007
Filed Under >Athar Osama, History, People, Politics
27 Comments
Total Views: 42146

Athar Osama

I am taking on the challenge of writing this piece with great trepidition, but utmost sincerity, and would like to state upfront that I truely believe that all of us, Pakistanis, including myself, owe a mountain of debt and gratitude to Qauid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah for giving us our freedoms in this country we call our homeland. Having said that, though, I would also beg to venture a bit further to say that while it was our solemn duty to establish the Pakistan of Quaid’s dreams in 1947–for that was the Pakistan for which hundreds of millions rallied behind him and over a million of us died, it is perhaps time now to dispassionately re-evalute that aspiration and take a more realistic view of our circumstances.

In the intervening 60 years, the reality of Pakistan’s politics and society has turned out to be everything but Quaid’s dream. We, as a nation and as people, have wandered around aimlessly looking for an identity and a raison detre for our existence and our quest to find our destiny has often been hijacked by unscruplous politicians, religious leaders, and miltiary dictators luring us with their own versions of Quaid’s dream. All political leaders–from the extreme right to the extreme left, from the theocrats to the democrats, from Islamists to the secularists–claim to be the custodians of Quaid’s Pakistan.
While nobody really knows what Quaid’s vision for Pakistan actually was for he said many things, on many occasions, and for many different audiences and it is easy to distort what he said to support one’s own version, we know one thing for sure. Quaid’s vision could not be all of what it is claimed to be at the same time. The struggle to interpret and re-interpret what Quaid may have said continues to this day…

This year, the 60th Independence day of Pakistan as well, it has been fashionable to refer back to the Quaid’s vision, the Quaid’s dream, or the Quaid’s Pakistan. But is it time that we lay the Quaid’s vision of 1940s–whatever it may have been–aside for a minute and take a more realistic view of it? Shouldn’t we take off the glasses that our forefathers should have worn sixty years ago, but didn’t, and look at the reality of Pakistan as it stands today?

In foreign policy, for instance, there are two main schools of thought–the idealists who see the world through an ideal, often moral, prism and the realists for whom the realpolitik determines the course of one’s decisions. I believe that when in comes to Pakistan, we have been too much of an idealist but not enough of the activists. We also, to this day, fail to look at Pakistan from a realistic standpoint.

Is it feasible today, for instance, to develop an ideal theocracy or an ideal secular democracy in Pakistan without really rupturing the social fabric of the country and alienting and disenfranschising a vast majority of its population? Far too often in the past, we have let the best become the enemy of the good with the result that in our desire to create the ideal Pakistan–Quaid’s Pakistan–we have ended up losing an opportunity to create a “good enough” Pakistan–a Pakistan that works for most of us.

I don’t claim to know what Quaid’s vision of Pakistan really was. I read his statements being used by the proponents of both Islamic and a Secular states. But I do know this. I know that above everything else, Quaid would have wanted us, all Pakistanis, to live in peace, harmony, and prosperity and would have been happy if we could decide for ourselves, today, how we want to live our lives. Does it really matter what Pakistan was supposed to be 60 years ago? That Pakistan never materialized in the first place. But it does certainly matter what we can make of it today, and it is our greatest duty to make the best of what we have. Learning about Pakistan’s history and what Quaid thought and did, and why he did it, is an important input into the process but the ultimate choice of what Pakistan needs to be rests with all of us, the people of Pakistan.

The problem with those who argue in the favor of both extremes–a Theocratic Islamic State or a Modern Secular Democracy–is that each of these groups has its own hidden agenda and neither of them is willing give the people of Pakistan the true choice and control of their own destiny. In an online poll carried out through the Understanding Pakistan Project, we found a virtual tie between those who want to establish an Islamic Democracy (46%) and those who would like to see a Modern Secular Democracy (44%) in Pakistan.

While neither of these groups are even in a simple numerical majority, it is safe to say, however, that the people of Pakistan (as represented by those who responded to this poll) choose democracy over any other form of government by an overwhelming majority. They also probably want it to be moderated and enshrined with the values of Islam–perhaps a brand of democracy unique to the Pakistani people? Whether Islamic Democracy is an oxymoron or whether, as argued by many notable Muslim scholars, democracy is an inherently Islamic concept is a debate beyond the scope of this post but the writing is clear on the wall!

What this system of governance would look like and what role would Islam play in Pakistan’s democracy is a decision best taken by the people of Pakistan in an open, comprehensive, and transparent manner. This is also perhaps the most important conversation that we Pakistanis need to have today.

Ultimately, Pakistan should be what its people want it to be and would be most comfortable living with, and not what an opportunististic religious or political leader would like us to believe what it must be. I have complete faith in the wisdom of the Pakistani people, for no matter how uneducated they may be, they know what is best for them and are willing to vote for it in an open and fair contest.

Let the poor people of Pakistan, for once in their lives, decide their own fates and not impose it upon them. All power to the people, not only in letter (like Pakistan Peoples Party) but also in spirit. I am sure Quaid would definitely wanted that to happen.

May this 58th anniversary of Quaid’s death bring us nearer to that goal…

Pakistan Zindabad !

About the Author: Dr. Athar Osama is a public policy analyst and an amateur historian of Pakistan’s political and constitutional history. He also the Founder of the Understanding Pakistan Project.

27 responses to “Pakistan of 2007: What Would Have Mr. Jinnah Wanted?”

  1. libertarian says:

    Pervaiz: Indian love and concerns for Pakistan are very obvious. Past sixty years have been nothing less than a long love affair.
    Yup, Suketu Mehta talked about the love affair ending under a beautiful orange mushroom cloud :-)

    Pakistan is not going to fall apart any time soon.
    I hope so.

    Take care.
    You do too.

  2. Jamshed says:

    I do agree with Dr Athar and it is a nice post but unfortunately the real problem is that we as Pakistani people dont really know what we want or we are so naive that we dont know what and who is good for Pakistan. The perfect example is right in front of us as we are inviting the 2 biggest crooks ( Sharif and Bhutto) back to our homeland who for years have raped Pakistan and have filled their pockets and have done absolutely nothing for Pakistan. Are we really naive or are we lost that we cannt even see who is good and who is bad for Pakistan. My sincere hope is that for once we find someone genuine who will do something good for My Pakistan and Pakistani people as we cannot go on like this for ever…….

    Pakistan Zindabad

  3. Pervaiz Munir Alvi says:

    Pseudonym libertarian: Indian love and concerns for Pakistan are very obvious. Past sixty years have been nothing less than a long love affair. But fear not my friend. Pakistan is not going to fall apart any time soon. We are used to these prognostications from your side. That is why I say may be it is a wish on your part. But I give you one. You had me laugh about your marital concerns. Take care.

  4. Zamir says:

    Librarian

    “”Very few question whether India will be around 50 years from now, notwithstanding the many fault-lines and serious problems””

    Actually not true, in 1997 India Today did a survey and asked Indians if they thought India would be around in 5o years. Around 60% were either not sure, or flat out said that they didn?t think it would be around. I don?t remember the exact numbers, but you can check it out.

  5. Rafay Kashmiri says:

    Pakistan od 2007 how Jinnah would have seen.

    “CERTAINLY NOT WHAT THE SECULARS WOULD HAVE TURNED INTO, I.E TOTAL RUIN, NO THANKS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*