Adil Najam
The news of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry’s reinstatement made one feel good. Real good. After a long time. It reminded one of all that we have been through. It reminded one, also, that exactly two year’s ago ATP had published the result of a Poll on whether the CJ’s removal was the right move. Maybe, the powers that were should have heeded our reader’s advice right then and spared themselves and everyone the ordeal:
(This Poll was conducted 2 years ago)
As I mentioned on NPR’s show All Things Considered today (read and listen to story here), I think what has happened has been truly revolutionary. However, as one wrote yesterday, the story is far from over. It has just taken the newest twist. It is a good twist. But we know much more is to follow. But what?
We do remember, of course, that he had been reinstated earlier too – by his peers in the Supreme Court. We also remember that promises and announcements are made by our political leaders to be broken. We also note that in listening to the speech it is not clear exactly what the terms of the decision are and exactly what the nature of the reinstatement will be. Also unclear is what the new power dynamics in Pakistan will be after this demonstration of the power of the people. It is very clear that this is a moral and political victory not of any political party or political leader but of the Pakistani people and of the Justice movement. But we also know that victory has a thousand fathers and many, including the vanquished will seek to take credit for it.
In short, more questions than answers loom before us and all indications suggest that things may become more unclear in the next many weeks than less.
But let me be totally clear, this is good unclarity, even necessary unclarity. What we have seen today is truly historic. As I have argued many times on this blog it was proved again that Pakistan is a democratic society trapped inside an undemocratic State. For two years now a citizen movement – a movement of progressive, liberal, educated, non-violence forces – persevered in the face of hardship, jailings, persecution, and ridicule even of their friends. And yet they fought on – non-violently and in a principled way – for an abstract idea. The idea that institutions matter. That justice matters.
For this to have happened in a society where too many on the extreme are trying to make points by violence (as extremists tried to do again today), where zealots and miscreants murder and cut off people’s ears and noses simply because they do not agree with them, where innocent people are blown up because of one’s misguided sense of religiosity, for this to have happened and for such major change to have come about in a peaceful way makes one very very happy. Ecstatic really.
Jinnah’s spirit must be smiling today. I certainly am.
But tomorrow, we all have to start asking ourselves the question: What next? The answers won’t be easy, but one hopes that people will show the same clarity of purpose they did here. There will be many questions. Here are some I can think of. I am sure our readers will add more questions. I am hopeful that they might also guide us on a few answers:
- Will this become Nawaz Sharif’s victory? If so, what will that mean for the power dynamics of Pakistan. If not, what does that mean for the power dynamics of Pakistan?
- Asif Ali Zardari remains the President. Bruised, beaten and weakened. But President nonetheless. Gen. Musharraf made an art-form of retreating under pressure and each time things became worse. How will it play out now?
- What about the dynamics within the PPP. A number of senior PPP leaders have been sidelined or have dropped out (including Aitizaz Ahsan). Does this mean that they will be brought back in – or might force their way back. What does this mean for the future of the PPP; with or without Zardari?
- What about the current court, including the new inductees and the balance of opinion in the Court? How would a reinstated Chief Justice Chaudhry act in that Court, especially on issues of political significance? Will he be able to act or will the media made every case before him a circus?
- And even if everything goes without hitch, what is the future of the amazing Citizen’s Movement that has been constructed here? My own hope is that a new politics may emerge in Pakistan around the faces and frameworks of this movement and that it will remain true to its aspirations rather than succumbing to political temptations.
There are, of course, so many other questions.
But the real one remains: What next?
“There we have opponents British govt.,Hindus,and our own people who were in support of United India.” Just saying ‘British govt. and All India Congress’ would have been more historically accurate and saved you a few unnecessary words. Jogendra Nath Mandal was Pakistan’s first Minister for Law. He was one of the Muslim League ministers Jinnah sent to Nehru’s interim Government. How many Pakistanis know about him? Honestly. Find out what became of him, and you will have an idea as to what has become of Pakistan. Of Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan. Of history. Of the turth. Of us. Of even our manners, where we forget that more than a million Pakistanis happen to be hindus. Justice Bhagwandas is only one of many fine examples. Every bit as fine as was Mr Mandal.
16 March might have been a good example of people realising that their opinion matters, but I do not see any one picking up Jinnah’s speech of 11 August 1947, and trying to understand it, let alone making it their opinion and objective: “Now, I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State.” Read the whole speech to understand the ‘ideal’ he is referring to. The ‘ideal’ that he thought could not only have won India freedom from the British much earlier, but also avoided her Partition! Now think what they taught us in Pakistan Studies.
Had we even an inkling of this ‘ideal’, we would have been doing an even bigger Long March to Swat. We would refuse to tolerate Nawaz Sharif’s silence on Taliban and Nizam-e-Adl, and Imran Khan’s despicable equivocation about it. We would reject the likes of Jamaat e Islami who rejected Pakistan and ridiculed the Quaid-e-Azam as Kafir-e-Azam.
I think the CEC meeting of the PPP is critical.
I hope that the PPP leadership will ask Zardari and his lackeys like Rahman Malik and Husan Haqqani to step down and the senior mature leaders will take charge of the party again.
Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui… a PML-N loyalist now… I believe he was their candidate for president…
Does anyone know who was the chief justice when NS was convicted after his 1999 overthrow? Just curious.
Very excellent.The struggle reminded us of pakistan movement.There we have opponents British govt.,Hindus,and our own people who were in support of United India.Without any violance under the Leadership of Quide Azam we fought .No one imagined that we could established a very prominent country which Insha Allah lead the world.We should never thoughtn to compromise with secularism as Islam is the best religion and by fully adopting ,practising world will be peaceful.Islam is not that which west think,but real Islam is in Quran,Ahadis and Seerat,We should work and make struggle, as we always done struggle to achieve our holy cause,to create an envirenment to imlement rule of shariah.People have shown confident in judiciary consisting of lawyers,judges,.If they btray the people still people have courage to deal with them as they have dealt Britishers,Hindues,betryers,like all dictators, politicians ,religious leaders and all,that is our history,not afraid of sacrifices.ALLAH HUM SAB KA HAMI OR NASIR HAY,AAMEEN.