Custom Search

I Fell Among Doctors

Posted on July 7, 2008
Filed Under >Mast Qalandar, Humor, Pakistanis Abroad, People
67 Comments
Total Views: 9623

Mast Qalandar

Last week, I went to Washington DC on personal business. I stayed at the Marriott Hotel on Woodley Road off Connecticut Avenue.

When I arrived at the hotel, and was taking out my luggage from the car, I could sense a commotion in the hotel — the sort of benign commotion that you see at Penn Station in New York during the rush hours or, if you are not familiar with New York, at Islamabad Airport during the Hajj flights. People were milling around, dragging their luggage behind them, going up and down the escalators and lounging around in the lobby of the hotel or wherever one could find a seat. There were Pakistanis all over the place —men, some of them in their ethnic dresses, women in their usual colorful dresses, and a lot of children, from toddlers to teens. I soon found out why.

APPNAAAPNAAPPNAAPPNA

The Association of Pakistani-American doctors, APPNA, was holding its annual get-together at the hotel. Hundreds of doctors of Pakistani origin from all over the US, along with their families, had descended upon the hotel. They do this thing once every year in different cities.

Khalid Hasan, in one of his columns, describes APPNA gatherings as mela-i-mawaishiaan (cattle show). Even though the impact, initially, is a bit overwhelming, I don’t quite agree with Khalid Hasan’s description. On the contrary, I quickly got over the initial impact and started enjoying the energy and dynamics of the scene.

Majority of the families who had converged at the hotel came from small-town-America where, in some cases, the total population of their town did not exceed the number of people gathered at the conference. Therefore, the exuberance of the delegates and their families at the sight of such a large gathering, in such a large city, in a large hotel, was understandable, even though it seemed to spill over at times.

Among the many helpful signs installed in the lobby that directed the guests to different areas and meeting rooms there was one indicating the timings of the 5 daily prayers.

Presence of religion in the hotel was palpable.

APPNAAPPNAAPPNAAPPNA

While I was walking down the corridor in search of my room, a Pakistani man, with a sparse beard, emerged from his room, his trousers rolled up above his ankles, water dripping from his hands and arms, and droplets of water hanging from his beard. It was maghrib time. He asked me if I knew which way the qibla was. Without a conscious thought I pointed to what I thought was the west. (In Pakistan the qibla is always to the west.) He thanked me and quickly retreated into his room presumably to say his maghrib prayer.

It occurred to me a little later that I had misled the good doctor. In the US the qibla is always toward the east. I felt very guilty. But then I consoled myself by telling me that I had given the information in good faith. To further pacify my conscience I also reminded myself of the verse that says something to the effect that to Him belongs the east and the west; so, whichever way you turn your face doesn’t really matter… 2:115

The APPNA managers had also arranged a delightful bazaar in the basement of the hotel, which catered to the needs of the delegates and their families not only in this world but also in the world hereafter. There were stalls selling clothes and jewelry, and stalls selling spiritual books and advice on cleansing the soul as well as the body. There were also stalls selling property in Dubai, and advice on managing your money. The variety of products and services on sale was amazing! The women folks thronged the bazaar most of the time.

On the second day of the conference or the mela, there was a political forum to discuss the ongoing ‘judicial crisis’ back home. APPNA had invited prominent politicians from Pakistan for this purpose. These sessions were open to everyone. Panelists included: Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, Justice Wajihuddin Ahmed, Ahsan Iqbal (PML-N), Farooq Sattar of MQM, and Pakistan’s new ambassador in Washington, Mr. Husain Haqqani. The hall was full. All seats were taken and many people were standing in the back and on the sides of the hall.

APPNAAPPNAAPPNAAPPNA

From the response of the audience to the different speakers one could see that the crowd in the hall was clearly a microcosm of Pakistan. Not only their views were divided along the political lines drawn so deeply on the political landscape of Pakistan but they also expressed their views with the same emotions, bordering on anger, that have been visible in Pakistan since March 2007. A large and vociferous section of the audience was for the restoration of pre-November 3 judiciary.

Aitzaz Ahsan was heard in pin-drop silence and received a standing ovation from the audience both before and after his speech. He was even hailed as “Obama of Pakistan!” by someone in the audience.

Ahsan Iqbal of PML(N) was heard patiently. Farooq Sattar was occasionally heckled but managed to say what he had to say. However, all hell seemed to break loose when Mr. Husain Haqqani spoke.

Mr. Haqqani is a smart man. He speaks well and writes well. I have heard him speak on TV and he always impressed me with clarity of his thought and coherence of his speech. He has written a great book, Between Mosque and Military, which, according to Stephen Cohen, is ” brilliantly researched and written book that should be required reading for anyone who wishes to understand this increasingly important state.” But on stage, in front of a crowd, Mr. Haqqani looked and acted more like a fighter rooster. He would try to put down his “opponents” with a sharp rebuttal or repartee. This technique might have won him points in a school debate but did not win many friends among the APPNA doctors in the hall.

The acrimony generated in the political debate, however, seemed to disappear in the evening when, during a musical show, young Amanat Ali sang some fast paced songs and the doctors did a wild bhangra in the hall.

I checked out of the hotel a day before the APPNA mela ended.

APPNAAPPNAAPPNAAPPNA

I was going up to my room to collect my luggage. When I got into the elevator there were already a few, ‘non-Pakistanis’ (Americans or Europeans) in it. Just when the doors of the elevator began to close, an exuberant Pakistani mother, in her colorful dress, accompanied by 3 or 4 excited kids, ranging in age from about 7 to 12 or 13, rushed in. We squeezed ourselves and pulled in our tummies to accommodate the woman and the kids. When everyone was in and had pushed his/her destination-floor buttons (the children having pushed more than one buttons) the doors closed, and that usual awkward silence fell in the elevator. The mother broke the silence by loudly asking the children in Enlgish, like a schoolteacher would ask a class, “hey, let’s sing Pakistani national anthem”. The children bashfully looked at their mother with question marks on their faces. They didn’t seem to think it was a great idea to sing in such a closed space with strangers around. But the mother wasn’t deterred. Like the conductor of a choir, with one hand raised, she raised piped up with a full-throated ‘Paaak sar zameeen shadbaad … The children simply stared at their toes in embarrassment. The strangers in the elevator, more perplexed than bemused, slipped out of the elevator at the first stop. I listened to her solo performance in silence. Had she not been so out of tune I would have possibly joined her.

I guess patriotism, like nostalgia, affects you at odd times and at odd places.

Overall, it seemed that the doctors had a good 3 days of R&R. Recreation and Religion, that is. What they need to do, I guess, is inject a bit of Renaissance and Reformation into APPNA to make it a really meaningful organization both for the country of their choice as well as that of their origin.

Photos for this post are by the author himself and the full collection can be seen here

67 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 9 8 7 [6] 5 4 3 2 1 »

  1. Sceptic says:
    July 11th, 2008 8:43 am

    If one is to believe Ibrahim, and I have no doubts on his religious scholarship, Islam is pretty much unworkable in this age. No wonder he’s trying to draw the strength by referring to the scriptures, rather than social or political realities, to put legs under his crumbling argument. Instead of hankering for theories, which are untested at best and failed at worst, he would have more credibility if he comes up with an example or two where the utopia of religion-based super-nation might have worked in the contemporary world. His theories until then will be considered just that, theories.

    I am still laughing at his obviously well-meaning advice for Indian Muslims to take a different, but united stance, than their government on certain political issues. I think they have already tried this act once before by deciding to politically “separate” themselves from their peers and friends on the basis of their religion in 1947. The tragic experience in itself and the results Pakistan are eye-opening examples of how-not-to-do things in the present world.

  2. Ibrahim says:
    July 10th, 2008 9:54 pm

    PMA: I can assure you Pakistan did not try pan-Islamism no matter how much the propaganda against it is fed to people. Plus, even if Pakistan had truly tried, it takes two sides to make brotherhood work. So, you are right, whatever Pakistan tried didn’t work. However, you are wrong to say it doesn’t work. It works on so many levels. You are looking through political prespective only. For example, the exchange of Islamic scholarship (scholars going from one country to another to teach/learn) between different Muslim countries is still going strong. There are other examples.

    You say “…Then why Muslims of the world should be one nation.” Because, the prophet (saw) said: Al-mo’min akhoo al-mo’min. A believer is a brother to (another) believer. And, there are other ahadith. It’s not a new concept that Islam puts more empahsis on brotherhood than other religions.

    Most of your objections are political, and what I had mentioned was more basic. It’s an individualistic responsibility to shun the symbols of nationalism that were mentioned. It doesn’t matter if that pans out worldwide or not.

    You say nationalism is a divisive force. And religion is not?.

    We’re talking about Muslims here. So, nationalism is and religion is not. If you meant sect then yes, the Shai-Sunni divide is as divisive as nationalism, but divide amongst other maslaks isn’t. You give them a common target and for a while they forget their differences.

    What about them (Indian Muslims)? The duty to rise above nationalism is same on them as it’s on Pakistanis. What it means is that that they should take a position different than their govt. on, for example, Kashmire, Palestine, etc.

    The sooner we separate religion and state the better it is for us.

    This call for secularism can never work for a Muslim country, for it’s kufr. Look at Turkey; it has to have a brutal, oppressive army to keep any semblance of secularism, and if not for the army secularism would be long gone. It’s not in the fitrat of Muslims. The sooner the liberals, secularists or modernists understand this the better.

  3. Edward says:
    July 10th, 2008 8:29 pm

    I was hoping the article talked more about Pakistani Doctors [why they work in small towns, what reception is there, what is the goal of these large conferences?] than your remorse at telling someone the wrong way to pray. It was an article with potential but it unfortunate lacked that quality.

    Also I’m sorry to say that mentions of Pakistan quickly turn into a mention of Islam.

  4. MQ says:
    July 10th, 2008 1:05 pm

    I realize it’s not a great idea to comment on one’s own post, unless required to clarify or answer something. I think I need to clarify something here.

    A slightly modified version of this post appeared in the op-ed columns of The News today under a different name. (Aqil and Aydee, yes, I do use a pen name.)

    The op-ed editor of The News, Omar Quraishi, did not want to use MQ as he had problem with the first part of the name, even though, I am sure, he would readily use a name like Mangal Bagh, if he ever received an op-ed piece from him. I had a long argument on this with Omar, but that is another story. (By the way, Omar can be pretty stubborn in certain things, I found out.)

    When I read the article in The News this morning I was pretty impressed. Not with the article, but with the reach of the print media (online included). Since the article gave my e-mail address I found more than a dozen e-mail messages from places as far apart as Swat, Lala-Musa, Lahore, Larkana, TharParkar, Athens, Pensacola, Fl. and several other places in the US.

    What I found interesting, though, was that while the readers from Pakistan (including the one from Swat. Remember Mangal Bagh?) could see the lighter side of life in the article and were mostly complimentary, those from the US were more focused on the direction of the Qibla and came with a lot of helpful advice and even some mathematical formulas to determine the exact direction, the latitude and the longitude included, of the Qibla. I wonder why can’t they, or don’t they, use that knowledge in sighting the moon.

  5. Rafay Kashmiri says:
    July 10th, 2008 1:02 pm

    @ Kia ajab itafaq, is blog par hogaya hay,
    Aik Azizi jo ab kehlata hay Akhmed,
    Hasan Abdal parh kar araha hoon,
    Yeh Qalandar to ab Mast hogaya hay
    Rafay Kashmiri

  6. Pervaiz Munir Alvi says:
    July 10th, 2008 8:57 am

    Shaji: You are taking this discussion to a different direction. This discussion is not about love and hate. I do not think Pakistanis hate or envy their neighbors. Neither the subject is accomplishments and failures of any country. The point is that for the last sixty years, on all international levels, India has played the role of an enemy of Pakistan. One does not have to rely upon the high school books for that. The history has documented it. Unfortunately you have not presented any facts contrary to that. Is India the only enemy of Pakistan. Certainly not. Pakistanis have played their part too. About the cordiality between individuals. Most people in life are kind to others. Regarding your personal negative feelings about your country of birth. Well that is your prerogative. I do not wish to debate on your feelings.

  7. Aqil Sajjad says:
    July 10th, 2008 7:56 am

    Yes, MQ, I was also thinking keh MQ = Aziz Akhmed? Having been used to seeing your posts with the name MQ, somehow, Aziz Akhmed fit nahin lug raha. Mind na keejiay ga, nothing against you; just that I wasn’t used to your real name.

  8. AHsn says:
    July 10th, 2008 4:58 am

    Dear MQ,
    I enjoyed reading your post as usual. Your post has given an opening to many interesting discussions. If you ever fall among Pakistani lawyers, scientists, engineers or …, please let us know your observations. Thanks.

Comment Pages: « 9 8 7 [6] 5 4 3 2 1 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!