7-Habits of Highly Dispensable Political Leaders

Posted on August 26, 2007
Filed Under >Athar Osama, People, Politics, Society
20 Comments
Total Views: 44584

Athar Osama

One of things that I’ve often said in my writings (and otherwise) about Pakistan’s sometimes messy and often uninspiring politics is that it is one dominated by personalities rather than issues. In Pakistan, personalities, in the absence of checks and balances, have often become bigger than institutions with the result that we have failed; in the 60 year old history of our country; in creating institutions, political or otherwise. This alone has caused immeasurable damage to the country over time.

Ayub Khan and Yahya KhanZulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Zia ul Haq
Benazir Bhutto and Ishaq KhanNawaz Sharif and Pervaiz Musharraf

With recent talk of a deal between Benazir Bhutto and Musharraf in the air, a childhood friend of mine who is a die-hard Peoples Party loyal remarked: “ab tu saray hi aik jaisay hain” (now all of them are the same!). Political analysts have also predicted doom and gloom for PPP should Benazir go ahead with the deal. These got me thinking about what are the tell-tale signs of a leader’s lack of sincerity and imminent downfall?

In other words, what are some of the signs that should tell you that it is time to ditch your favorite politician? Switch your political party? or demand a change in your party’s political leadership? If our politicians can switch their loyalties, why can’t we?

Drawing upon our rich and colorful political history, what criteria can we apply to make that decision? Based on my own limited reading of Pakistan’s history – through the Understanding Pakistan Project – here are the Seven Habits of Highly Dispensable (Political) Leaders:

1. The leader acts as if he or she is bigger than institutions: This is one of the most long-held positions of Pakistan’s highly dispensable politicians. It is now so ingrained in our political psyche that Pakistan is left with no real (political) institutions today. The Election Commission, The Ehtesaab Bureau, or The Supreme Court of Pakistan. We’ve seen it all and they’ve done it to all.

2. The leader tells you; and probably believes in it too; that only he or she can save the country: This is one of the most favorite positions of Pakistan’s highly dispensable politicians. Somehow the country is full of many saviors and yet the situation has, over the years, only managed to deteriorate for all of us. There are rare circumstances when this may be true and when that happens it is quite self-evident and the leader hardly has to tell you that. So, for all practical purposes when your politician tells you that only he or she can save the country, you can be pretty sure that he is as dispensable as a cup of styro-foam.

3. The leader tells you that only he or she knows what is right for you and your country: Arrogance is perhaps the most common habit of a politician gone bad–not only in Pakistan but also elsewhere (remember Bush’s “you’re with us or against us?”) The most humbling and beautiful moment of a true democracy is when a politician stands corrected and reminded, sometimes in quite a brutal manner, of the “wisdom of the crowd”. When your politician tells you that only he or she knows what is right for you and your country, its time to press the eject button under his or her seat.

4. The leader is chosen for his or her loyalty rather than independence, integrity, or competence: More often than not during Pakistan’s sixty year old history, leaders have chosen their successors for their loyalty rather than independence, independence, and competence. Khawaja Nazimuddin, General Mohammad Musa, Ziaul Haq, or even Musharraf, you name it. Many of these decisions have backfired and have caused serious repercussions for the country. When these decisions are made, something goes quite wrong with the system. You get the picture.

5. The leader makes a “temporary” compromise on a fundamental principle that defines him or her: This is another favorite one of mine. Pakistani leaders are often associated with certain “principles” that define them. Pakistan Peoples Party stands for democracy and struggle against military rule in Pakistan. Tehrik-e-Insaaf stands for justice and constitutionalism. General Musharraf, when he came to power, promised broad-based political reforms. When these principles are compromised the leader doesn’t remain the same leader any more. When a leader compromises on a fundamental principle, it is a surest sign that he or she deserves to be shown the door.

6. The leader owes his or her legitimacy to somebody else but your vote: This is a tricky one because it is often hard to tell. As far as this one is concerned our political leaders quite often say just the right things. However, the voters need to ask themselves a question: Does this person need the goodwill of anybody else except the electorate to stay in power? Whether it is the Army or America, when the answer to the above question is in the positive one can rest assured that Pakistan’s interests and those of its people will take the second seat. So should they in our hearts and minds…

7. The leader thrives by creating a vacuum of leadership around him: This is a deep one and has many manifestations. Many a times, the leader actively creates a political around him to make himself dispensable. In other situations, you would find him surrounding him or herself with utterly incapable people (think: Law Minister Wasi Zafar, for instance) who not only provide him bad advice but also insulate him from the reality. He or she becomes inaccessible to the masses. By the same token, he should also lose the consent of the masses.

Most Pakistani politicians – and I challenge you on that one – have shown one or more these traits just prior to their downfall and some even throughout their political careers. When you see a large number or all of these traits working at the same time, you almost know that a perfect political storm is just round the corner and that the days of that individual are numbered. The “political bug” has not spared even a single soul in public office. Both genders are equally susceptible.

In a sense the above list forms a series of tests, a checklist, so to speak that one can tick-off for every politician to see how close he or she is to his ultimate demise and/or how badly infected he or she is with the political bug. It is also a tool to use while reading the political statements of our worthy politicians Can the readers think of any other generalizable character trait, sign, or habit that our political leaders have demonstrated repeatedly as they have fallen from grace? How would Ayub Khan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Zia-ul-Haq, Benazir Bhutto, Nawaz Sharif, and Pervez Musharraf fare on each of these seven tests?

I leave that judgment to you all…

Dr. Athar Osama is a public policy analyst and amateur historian of Pakistan’s political and constitutional history. He is also the founder of The Understanding Pakistan Project. An earlier version of this article was published at Dawn.com.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

20 responses to “7-Habits of Highly Dispensable Political Leaders”

  1. Irfan Mirza says:

    Good article by Mr. Athar Osama. He must write more on the leadership styles of the Pakistani Leaders!

  2. Pervaiz Munir Alvi says:

    Ali Raza: I could not agree more with you. Unless we all agree to put our respective ethnic-linguistic-sectarian identities as our secondary identity, and Pakistan as our first, we are not a one-nation. It is that simple. We have a choice. We could rise above the ethnic & linguistic level and unite as one great nation standing under one flag of Pakistan or we could fall apart as multiple mini-states. Both scenarios are within our grasp.

  3. ali raza says:

    MANAS SHEIKH unless PAKISTANIS drop their ETHNIC cum SECTARIAN identities NO hope

  4. Interesting points made in the article. However, as “YLH” and “Ali Zain” mentioned above, its true that those traits are usually common among all politicians. As a poli sicience student, these are soe of the things that are actually taught in schools in terms of successing in politics. There is a reason its called a “dirty game”, no matter what system or country you live in.

    However, when it comes to leadership and a politican’s use of his office, I would certainly say that its something that his intelligence and accumen will determine how he uses his office. It is only very few who are smart enough to make a tactical decision (even if its a temporary compromise) for a greater cause or for a long-term vision. I think in our system, some did try but most of them were not capable enough to make use of the cards they were dealt. And some just made a complete mess of the once-in-a-lifetime opportunities that came to them even though they achieved some small results but did not seize the opportunities as they should have been(Musharaf and 9/11, Nawaz and nuclear bomb, Benazir and Army).

    I think we should try to pick smart and intelligent politicans based on their track record and the vision and unfourtunalty on that basis we may not have too many options in our present system.

  5. Leader means visionary personality who can lead others to achieve certain vision…

    I cant find any leader in political dog fight except ZA Bhutto..

    Rest who so ever has been pawns of game rigged by vested intersts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*