Grading Our Leaders: Some Surprising Poll Results

Posted on April 18, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, ATP Poll, People, Politics
25 Comments
Total Views: 34354

Adil Najam

At one level the results of our ATP Poll on Grading Pakistan’s leadership and power centers are not surprising at all. However, when we compare the result of this ATP Poll to related ATP Polls held in June 2009 and September 2009, then there is a rather interesting trend that seems to be apparent in the responses from our readers.

In the overall results, counting the grades given by more than 850 readers for each ofteh six categories, President Asif Ali Zardari was given an average grade of D+ (GPA=1.38 on a 4 point scale), Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gillani gets a grade of C (GPA=1.96), Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry gets a grade of C+ (GPA=2.21), Chief of Army Staff Gen. Pervez Ashfaq Kiyani also gets a grade of C+ (2.28), Leader of the Opposition Nawaz Sharif gets a grade of D (GPA=1.00) and the Pakistan Media was given a grade of C- (GPA=1.64). As before, we used the standard 4-point scale to convert the votes into a letter grade (A=4.0, B=3.0, C=2.0, D=1.0, F=0.0).

Not unexpectedly, it is the votes at the extremes that defined the results. Strong supporters, and often even stronger opponents, voted at the extremes. Nearly a quarter of all votes cast (some 1,300 combined votes out of the combined 5,221 votes cast in the six categories) gave a grade of “F” (Failing). Extreme grading  indeed; and not different from the last time we held this Poll. The most F’s were given to President Zardari (45%), with Nawaz Sharif trailing closely with 37% F’s,  Prime Minister Gillani getting 20% F’s, the media getting 18% F’s, Gen. Kiyani 17% F’s, and the Chief Justice getting 12% F’s. This meant that getting a decent grade was statistically impossible for anyone, even though the A’s were also quite generous for many of them: Gen. Kiyani got 26% A’s, the Chief Justice got 19% A’s, President Zardari and Prime Minister Gillani both got 18% A’s, the Media got 7% A’s and the least A’s went to Nawaz Sharif for whom only 3% of the votes were A’s.

But none of this is that surprising, or even that interesting. What is interesting and surprising is the comparison to our previous ATP Poll. Although these are not scientific polls and they are certainly not reflective of what “Pakistan thinks” they are certainly representative of what ATP readers think, and since that readership has not changed by much between last year and now, one assumes that at least in this cohort of Pakistanis there are some interesting trends that can be deciphered:

  • The only leaders whose average grade has improved since June 2009 are President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gillani. President Zardari moved up from a grade of D (GPA=0.97) to D+ (GPA=1.38) in this period, an impressive GPA jump of +0.41. Prime Minister Gillani moved up from a grade of C- (GPA=1.67) to C (GPA=1.96), with a GPA jump of +0.29. One assumes that the recent passage of the 18th amendment has something to do with this.
  • The deepest decline in grade – by a full grade point – was seen by Opposition Leader Nawaz Sharif, who moved from a grade of C (GPA=1.91) in June 2009 down to a grade of D (GPA=1.00) in April 2010. His also now has the distinction of having the lowest grade in the pack.
  • The only person whose grade remained the same in both periods was Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. Although he remains at a C+, there is a GPA decline of -0.15 from 2.36 to 2.21 which implies that there is a decline, although not enough to change his grade.
  • The Army Chief also saw a decline in his grade from a B- in June 2009 to a C+ now. This implies a GPA decline of -0.40 from 2.68 to 2.28. One assumes that the current military operations may have something to do with this.
  • Even the Media has seen a decline in its grade. Back in September 2009 the Media had scored a C grade with a GPA of 2.06, now it scored a C- with a GPA of 1.64; a GPA decline of -0.42.

As always, one should caution that we cannot make any more of this than we should. It is, after all, a blog poll and reflects the opinions of a particular type of Pakistanis. But it does suggest that the opinion of this type of Pakistani may be shifting just that slightly; at least for the moment.

25 responses to “Grading Our Leaders: Some Surprising Poll Results”

  1. Darweesh says:

    not only scheming,rather clever planning :D

  2. yoohoo says:

    I think it means not much his happening,
    but probably a lot of scheming :D

  3. ali hamdani says:

    I think this is a enough fair picture but I would also like to add sumthin. The problem Pakistan faces right now is not only of bad economy but much blame goes to the security issues in the country and thus we should realize that terrorism cannot be cured over night. We must give some edge to these leader though for taking control of the country at such a critical time.

  4. Eidee Man says:

    I’m happy to see Nawaz Sharif holding the dead-last position he deserves.

    The fact that Zardari evokes so many negative emotions in people has ironically benefited Pakistan; a president with better public support would definitely not have bowed down to one request after the other the way Zardari has. One hopes that Gilani will now stop being just a bystander and start taking initiative.

  5. Omar says:

    Clear pattern here. Those who haved faced regular accountability get a poorer rating than those who are not answerable to anyone. I wonder if the ratings would be the same if army, judiciary and media top brass were subject to the same level and rigour of scrutiny that the politicians have gone through. We’ve seen lots of dirty linen from messeurs Zardari, Sharif and politicians as a tribe. Not so much for the others, but don’t for a moment think there’s no filth there.

    Such is the Pakistani state of affairs that the leadership popularity pageant is not a choice for the prettiest but one for the least ugly. And we, the people, mistake the “parda-nasheeni” of the army and judiciary for beauty.

    As for the media, less said the better. Amongst its most prominent personalities are those who are corrupt to the core. That in itself is in keeping with our society and not a surpirse. Whats makes it completely insulting is the self-righteous, holier than thou attitude that the media takes towards everyone else.

    The rating trends indicate some recognition of these subtleties but not enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*