Posted on April 21, 2011
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, People, Women
Total Views: 59878

Email a copy of 'Mukhtar Mai Case: Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Against LHC Verdict. What Now?' to a friend

* Required Field

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 3 entries.

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 3 entries.

E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

50 responses to “Mukhtar Mai Case: Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Against LHC Verdict. What Now?”

  1. readinglord says:

    “Na-Pakistan? where are the thekedars of namoos/e rasalat? what do they say about namoos’e insaan?”

    Who raised this great question about ‘Namoos-e-Insan’ – the human-beings who are called ‘Ashraf-ul-makhlooqat’? It is for the human beings that messengers were sent for their guidance, safety and well-being and not for their extermination as desired by the anti-human mullah.

    See what the Qurane Hakim said in this respect:

    “17:70 We have honored the sons of Adam; provided them with transport on land and sea; given them for sustenance things good and pure; and conferred on them special favours, above a great part of our creation.

    Al-Isra [17:70]

    وَلَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي آدَمَ وَحَمَلْنَاهُمْ فِي الْبَرِّ وَالْبَحْرِ وَرَزَقْنَاهُم مِّنَ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَفَضَّلْنَاهُمْ
    عَلَى كَثِيرٍ مِّمَّنْ خَلَقْنَا تَفْضِيلا”

    But the mullah have monopolized all this honour by calling themselves as ‘Ulemaa-e-karaam’.

  2. readinglord says:


    It is a war sir and all is fair in love and war. But this Dharna show is just a mockery relief interval during that horrible war where horrible carnage is going on between drone attacks and suicide bombers .

    As regards Mai’s case, it is indeed
    a media-cum-NGO fraud of the
    century. Just read the
    detail judgments of the
    superior courts. The victim
    in this drama, if any, were
    the Mastoies, over dozen of
    whom remained jailed for
    over nine years for
    no crime because of this
    fraudulent drama.

    One shudders at the callous
    -ness both of the judicial
    system and the so called women
    rights activists in this whole drama.

  3. mustafa says:

    Hmmmm… There are more sad and difficult stories to write about innocent people of tribal areas who are killed by american unmanned air strikes.

    I guess it’s non of your interest to cover a huge gathering of Pakistani’s in Peshawar for the sovereignty of Pakistan.

  4. readinglord says:

    What else one can one expect from a wakil about whom Akbar Allahabadi had rightly said:

    پیدا ہوا وکیل تو ابلیس نے کہا
    لو آج ھم بھی صاحب اولاد ہو گئے

    Wakil is least interested in justice. His interest is only in either winning the case or to keep it going on to extract as much money from his client as possible or to earn cheap publicity in high profile cases.

    Sorry to say, Adil Najam, and his Administrator has not done justice to the case either. They seems both also to be feministically Mai worshipers. Justice demands that in reply to the Press Release by the advocate for the appellant criticizing the judgment, a detailed judgement of the court in this case should also have been given.

    I am sure the truth shall come out one day that it was all a media and NGO fraud of the century.

  5. Moon says:

    I find this amusing accusing ATP forgetting Moin at the cost of Mukhtara Mai.

    Its too soon to pass such comments. Anyways to answer this an article on Moin is already posted