Shoaib Akhtar – A Fallen Hero?

Posted on May 18, 2008
Filed Under >Raza Rumi, People, Sports
42 Comments
Total Views: 33453

Raza Rumi

I am not concerned with the technicalities of Shoaib Akhtar’s sentence, which have been the subject of much debate across Pakistan and indeed wherever cricket is played and followed. There have been some avoidable outbursts by both Akhtar and his disciplinarians. Akhtar has a chequered past in the conventional sense; and perhaps his tragic flaw is the cavalier attitude that is now a hallmark of his persona. But he is a star whose talent has done cricket, Pakistan, and Pakistanis proud. The quantum of punishment given to him has therefore been viewed as some sort of betrayal, and many have termed it unfair. But this is now a sub judice matter and so cannot be commented upon any further.

However, what lies underneath the narrative of Shoaib Akhtar’s plight relates to the sociological and attitudinal trends that have now engulfed Pakistan, like a poisonous creeper that consumes even the best kept plants in a garden.

Shoaib Akhtar is self-made, rising from humble origins into the global limelight. Born at Morgah, a small town near Rawalpindi, on August 13 1975, he is the youngest of four sons (he also has a younger sister) of an oil refinery worker. Far from following in his father’s footsteps, however, Akhtar began to show cricketing talent while still at school. It was at Asghar Mall College, during his twenties, that his extraordinary skill at the game was recognised; he played at increasingly high levels (including a spell for the English team Worcestershire), culminating in his selection for the national team in 1997. He then shot to international fame during the 1999 World Cup. Stunning spectators with his bowling ability, he went on to set the world record for bowling speed at 100.2 mph, where it still stands.

Nicknamed “The Rawalpindi Express,” Akhtar’s performance in the 1999 World Cup meant that he suddenly became a household name in Pakistan. The immense run-up, the hurtling legs, the characteristic flop of the hair: every young man on the Pakistani streets wanted to be Shoaib Akhtar. It is clear, however, that he belongs to no family or cartel of cricketers. Through this transition to stardom, Akhtar’s attitude reflected his independence and self-reliance, his use only of his own abilities, strengths and skills. Until now, he has defied the sport’s entrenched culture of patronage, and therefore has neither sought, nor benefited from, it. Hence his troubled relations with the authorities, and his reluctance to follow the ingrained feudal culture of obedience, have found resonance with a changing Pakistan.

It is not just the issue of patronage; not unlike the vast majority of Pakistanis, Shoaib Akhtar has been avowedly secular in his views and personal life. The Pakistani team that was almost invaded by preaching brigades, and ultimately indulged in displays of public piety from the PIA flights to the cricket grounds, did not find much sympathy in Akhtar’s view of the world. While many of his former associates were growing beards and following a particular sectarian version of Islamic piety, Akhtar was busy partying whenever and wherever he wanted. So an outcast had already been defined.

Asked in an interview with an Urdu newspaper whether he was religious, he replied: “Islam is our faith and integral to our lives; however, I do not believe in imposing it on others and also dislike wearing it on your sleeve.” In most public statements he has expressed his belief in God but stayed away from the public dimension that we have all been cursed with since General Zia ul Huq’s destruction of Pakistani society.

However the greatest breach of proprietary is Akhtar’s friendliness to India and Indians despite his proud Pakistani identity; he has never been shy of befriending the Indians, from Bollywood stars to common people on the street and in the stadiums. The legendary image of Shoaib Akhtar picking up the cap of an Indian policeman in a cricket ground and wearing it says much more than various rounds of composite dialogue and is perhaps the most forceful display in recent times of clichéd “people-to-people contact.” Akhtar is playful, casual and yet inherently dangerous. He goes too far, breaking the barrier well before officialdom has made the leap.

After all, he is playing for the Indian League; he is working with Shahrukh Khan on a film; and he is involved in charity programmes for special children. Not to mention that he races – shirtless at that – with another star, Salman Khan, under the media’s glare.

The middle class morality surrounding him has also been hyped beyond belief. A few random pictures of Akhtar from the foreign press standing in a jovial party mood with some girls have been stretched beyond reasonable limits and commented on out of context. Perhaps the media that flashes these pictures time and again forgets that this sort of contact between men and women is in most societies a routine affair; and more often than not has none of the sexual or immoral connotations that the custodians of public morality would have us believe.

His statements against fundamentalism, for instance his remark that Islam is not practiced with beards alone, must be too much to handle when many of his colleagues sport unwieldy beards. We know that the Pakistan Cricket Board has taken cognizance of the players’ public displays of religiosity in the past, but the reality is that the influence of tableeghis now permeates Pakistan’s corridors of power, including its high-profile cricket team.

Shoaib Akhtar’s character assassination is worrying. Those of us who want the pluralist, secular Pakistan envisaged by the Quaid-e-Azam feel upset when the personal life of a player becomes as important as his performance. And those of us who believe that we need to be at peace with our neighbours – especially India – are also concerned. Any deviation from the ends of peace and coexistence with our larger neighbour would be suicidal; and stars like Shoaib are the best confidence building measure we can think of these days.

While the sentence awarded by the Board needs to be respected – a need germane to the much talked about “rule of law” these days – one cannot help but sympathise with the predicament of Shoaib Akhtar. Therefore, while we shall lament his acts of indiscipline if they are finally proved, we will always respect Akhtar for his talent and praise him for being a beacon in the darkness of extremism.

ATP’s Other Posts Related to Shoaib Akhtar

1. Shoaib Akhtar: How many times can you say you’re sorry?
2. Work Horses of Pakistan in ODIs
3. Oops, I did it again
4. Shoaib Akhtar Unplugged: Of Song, Dope and Religion
5. A Pakistan Cricket Dream Team
6. Two Pakistani players banned for doping
7. Shoaib Akhtar grabs his 200th ODI Wicket

Related Posts with Thumbnails

42 responses to “Shoaib Akhtar – A Fallen Hero?”

  1. mazhar says:

    The final straw for me was this:

    Shoaib is pardoned yet again and his ban is lifted, so he can play for IPL with an eagerness he never showed for Pakistan.

    Quotes exactly with interpretations in brackets:
    “I really love playing in India. Calcutta is like my home city, Eden Gardens is like my home ground (fell short of saying that India is my home country and I never heard of Pakistan). I thank the people of India for supporting me ( I dont give a damn about the people of Pakistan ). My special thanks go to Shahrukh Khan ( a powerful Indian messiah ) for supporting me ( and liberating me from the clutches of monsters of PCB) during these hard times.
    ———————————————————–

    I felt so ashamed after reading cricinfo the day these statements were published that I wish Shoaib had never been a part of Pakistan cricket. Let him show a bit of tantrums in IPL, there at least he will know what discipline is when he will be kicked out in a moment by SRK and Ganguly.

  2. Expat says:

    We are a country of mediocres. Look at any aspects of our country’s life today. It is full of mediocres and any exceptional talent is disowned and punished as quickly and severely as possible so taht no talented youth can even dream of making it to the top.

    Same has happened to our cricket team also. Shoaib is today the only exceptionally talented player in the team. Rest are all mediocre along with the members of the cricket board. He is being punished for his excellence.

  3. We can not sacrifice our social.religious andcultural traditions for talent of whatever high nature.We believe that Shoaib Akhtar is asset for pakistan cricket team.however you can cut the hands of thief if people are provided with their entire needs means an envirenment of welfare islamic state first created,similarly we should first correct the mess prevailing in our country pakistan in all spheres of our life than we can imlement the laws of the country according to shariah even if you consider yourselves secular.

  4. Mahmood says:

    I think everybody realize that Pakistani cricketers weren’t and will not be the role model of ethics. However, the particular ban on Shoaib we are talking about was in light of the ruling he got after escaping the “bat swing” incident. He was told clearly that if he commit any breach of contract or misconduct during next two years, he will be banned for life. He made a reckless statement without even making a comeback. He even continued to do so during his appeal against the ban not only about PCB but ICC match fixing and stuff also…only thing you can say after hearing it is…WOW!

    Though in my contract with the company I work for, there are no do’s and don’t mentioned about my statements…however, I souldn’t be too surprised to get a boot on my butt when I criticize my company policies in public not once, not twice but countless times, even though I get a clear cut guidance what can I say in public and what I can’t after my intial foolishness. My company will not go out of business without me no matter how talented I am.

    P.S. BTW, as you all know, he is again injured…after less then 10 overs in IPL. It excites me when he take his run-up but on the other hand, the disappoints are just too much.

  5. Niaz says:

    Dear Haris

    Wouldn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*